How Can You Determine the Kinematics of Rigid Body BD in a Rotating System?

chart2006
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Knowing that crank AB has a constant angular velocity of 160rpm counterclockwise, determine and plot, for values of \theta from 0 to 360 degrees, (a) the angular velocity and angular acceleration of rod BD, (b) the velocity and acceleration of collar D.
http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/557399749_04082009_1.jpg

Homework Equations



I don't know! :(


The Attempt at a Solution



\lamda =160rpm=160(\frac{2\pi}{60})rad/s

Unfortunately this is as far as I've been able to get. The reason is because I'm not sure as how to derive an equation that would allow me to plug in a value from 0 to 360 for theta and it give me beta (angle of bar BD from the horizontal). If I can just get past that point I can figure the rest out. With any other problem there is a fixed position in which I can just use the triangle method to figure it out but i can't really do that here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi chart 2006

you know then length AB & BD and the also the vertical component of AD

the vertical component of AB is AB.Sin(theta) from this you should be able to find the vertical component of BD, ie BD.Sin(beta)...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top