How Can You Measure the Distance Between Two Subspaces in Higher Dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello.
Let´s suppose we are given two subspaces of \mathbb{R}^n that have dimension k, where 1\leq k<n. I think they are called grassmanians.
How can I compute a "distance" between two different k-subspaces?


my attempt to a solution:
As a toy example, for n=2 and k=1 we can use the minimum angle between the unit-vectors u and v:

d(u,v)=\frac{|<u,v>|}{|u||v|}

In order to extend this to more dimensions I used the definition of scalar product used in Geometric (Clifford) Algebra, which is:

\ast : \wedge\mathbb{R}^n \times \wedge\mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}

A\ast B=(a_1\wedge\ldots\wedge a_k)\ast(b_1\wedge\ldots\wedge b_m)=det[m_{ij}] ; for k=m
A\ast B=0 ; for k\neq m

where the (i,j) element of that matrix is m_{ij}=<a_i,b_j>.
Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define "distance"?
 
I thought of quantifying the "distance" between the subspaces with the minimum angle between them (see the toy-example in 2-dimensions in my first post).

The scalar product (and contraction) introduced in Geometric (Clifford) Algebra is used to compute the angle between subspaces of same (or different) dimensions.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
16K
3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Back
Top