How can you use the line integral to find the work done by a conservative force?

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 160-lb man carries a 25-lb can of paint up a helical staircase that encircles a silo witha radius of 20 ft. If the silo is 90 ft high and the man makes exactly three complete revolutions, how much work is done by the man against gravity in climbing to the top?


Homework Equations


W= line integral of dot product of F(r(t)) -dot- r'(t)



The Attempt at a Solution


My r(t)= (20cost, 20sint, 90)
r'(t)=(-20sint, 20cost, 0)
t is between 0 and 6pi
I know that gravity is -9.8 in the k direction. However I don't know what to use for my vector field...or if I should be using a different r(t). At first I tried using <0,0,-9.8> -dot- <-20sint,20cost,0> but obviously that just gives me zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The path taken is that described of a helix. How would you parametrise a helix? It should have non-zero components for all the i,j,k directions.
 
fk378 said:

Homework Statement


A 160-lb man carries a 25-lb can of paint up a helical staircase that encircles a silo witha radius of 20 ft. If the silo is 90 ft high and the man makes exactly three complete revolutions, how much work is done by the man against gravity in climbing to the top?


Homework Equations


W= line integral of dot product of F(r(t)) -dot- r'(t)



The Attempt at a Solution


My r(t)= (20cost, 20sint, 90)
r'(t)=(-20sint, 20cost, 0)
t is between 0 and 6pi
I know that gravity is -9.8 in the k direction. However I don't know what to use for my vector field...or if I should be using a different r(t). At first I tried using <0,0,-9.8> -dot- <-20sint,20cost,0> but obviously that just gives me zero.

It's a conservative force so the answer is simply mgh.
You may take the total displacement vector dotted with minus the force of gravity and you get of course mgh.

Do you have to prove it with an integral? I don't understand your r(t), the third compoenent (the 90) is not a constant as the man is climbing.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top