How close are we to genetically altering brain functionality?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thehacker3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of genetically altering brain functionality to enhance memory and processing speed. Participants unanimously agree that current scientific understanding of genetics and brain function is insufficient for such advancements. Previous attempts at gene therapy have resulted in severe consequences, highlighting the complexity of genetic interactions. Overall, the consensus is that significant breakthroughs in this area are not imminent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gene therapy principles and historical context
  • Knowledge of brain functionality and cognitive enhancement techniques
  • Familiarity with the dual n-back method for improving working memory
  • Awareness of the complexities of genetic interactions and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history and outcomes of gene therapy over the past two decades
  • Explore the dual n-back method and its effectiveness in cognitive enhancement
  • Study the current state of neuroscience regarding memory and brain function
  • Investigate ethical considerations surrounding genetic modifications in humans
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for neuroscientists, geneticists, cognitive psychologists, and anyone interested in the ethical implications of genetic modifications and cognitive enhancement techniques.

thehacker3
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Title says it all. How close are we to genetically instilling more memory, faster processing power, etc.. in the human brain?

Can an admin please PM this time before just deleting the thread? It's a serious question and an interesting discussion if taken as such.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
thehacker3 said:
Title says it all. How close are we to genetically instilling more memory, faster processing power, etc.. in the human brain?

Can an admin please PM this time before just deleting the thread? It's a serious question and an interesting discussion if taken as such.

Not close at all... remember that to achieve those ends we need to have a deep understanding of memory and what makes the brain work "faster" and "better". The last time gene therapy was tried with good intentions and little testing, it killed all save one participant.

I would say we're not even within sight of such a breakthrough, unless it came out of nowhere. Remember that genes act in an incredibly complex fashion with each other, the environment, and then each other again. It's one thing to make a fern bioluminescent, quite another to enhance a brain without killing it.
 
nismaratwork said:
Not close at all... remember that to achieve those ends we need to have a deep understanding of memory and what makes the brain work "faster" and "better". The last time gene therapy was tried with good intentions and little testing, it killed all save one participant.

I would say we're not even within sight of such a breakthrough, unless it came out of nowhere. Remember that genes act in an incredibly complex fashion with each other, the environment, and then each other again. It's one thing to make a fern bioluminescent, quite another to enhance a brain without killing it.

Thank you for a much more informative response. This answered my question quite well, actually.
 
thehacker3 said:
Thank you for a much more informative response. This answered my question quite well, actually.

Glad to hear it, and if you're intersted (which it seems you are), I'd begin by researching gene therapy over the past decade or two, the expecations for it at the outset, and the reality.

There is a lot of promise in our genome, and altering it, but first we need to understand it... and we don't... not even close.
 
Proton Soup said:
you could try the dual n-back method to increase working memory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-back#Dual_n-back

i downloaded the brain workshop game, but just never seem to find the interest to play it.

My college statistics professor directed us to that game.

Agreed, no interest to play it, even if it may increase working memory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K