How Deep Can a Diver Go with a Snorkel Based on Lung Pressure Differential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moe*
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating how deep a diver can go with a snorkel based on lung pressure differential, which is approximately 1/20 of an atmosphere. The relevant equation for pressure is presented, but the user encounters issues with unit conversion and dimensional analysis. It is emphasized that the density of water should be correctly used as 1000 kg/m³ instead of the incorrect 0.001 g/l. The user is advised to consistently apply the S.I. system for accurate results, particularly using Pascals for pressure. Proper unit cancellation confirms that height should indeed be expressed in meters, resolving the confusion in the calculations.
Moe*
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



THe human lungs can operate w a pressure differential of abt 1/20 of an atmosphere. If a diver uses a snorkle for breathing, about how far below the water level can they swim?

Homework Equations



P=P(i) + pgh

where p is ro, density.

The Attempt at a Solution



1026kPa=101.3kPa + (0.001g/l)(9.8m/s^2)(h)

I isolated for h, but the number i get is way larger than the diameter of earth.

My problem is this: the units don't seemt o cancel out properly. the units for height work out to be L/m^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not using a proper set of units here. Use the S.I system throughout. For pressure, use Pascals (Pa), not kPa. 1 Pa = 1 N/m² . For density, use kg/m³. Density of water is: 1000 kg/m³. You have used the right units for gravitational acceleration and your 'h' should come out in meters.

You have used the density of water as 0.001 g/l. It is actually 1000 g/l. [or 1000 kg/m³].

As for the unit dimensions, you are getting it as L/m². 'L' is litres, so it has the dimension, [Length]³, and the denominator has dimension, [Length]². When it cancels out, you get the height's dimensions as [Length].. so there is no error in the dimensional analysis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top