How did Kepler derive his laws WITHOUT law of gravitation?

AI Thread Summary
Kepler derived his laws of planetary motion primarily through meticulous analysis of Tycho Brahe's extensive observational data after Brahe's death. He identified that planets follow elliptical orbits around the Sun, a conclusion reached without the knowledge of gravitational forces. Kepler's work was driven by the need to explain the observed motions of planets, particularly Mars, which he found to describe an elliptical path. His approach contrasted with the prevailing belief in circular orbits, showcasing his innovative thinking. Ultimately, both Kepler's and Newton's laws were rooted in observational data, highlighting the importance of empirical evidence in scientific discovery.
Hansa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hansa said:
Was it purely based on observations?

I believe it was.
 
As far as I understand, Kepler gained access to all of Tycho Brahe's astronomical observational data when Tycho Brahe died. He used this data to model the solar system as heliocentric, with the planets orbiting the Sun in ellipses. He never developed an explanation for why they did this.
 
Thanks, that answers the question. :)
 
To use an movement low like ## x(t) = x_0 + v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 ## I needn't any law of force or any other reason of motion. The motion is that I observe.
 
Hansa said:
Was it purely based on observations?

Is there another way?
 
andresB said:
Is there another way?
The alternative is to start with a force law and see what motion it predicts.

Kepler did not use a force law. He started with observations and determined a pattern of motion -- a traversal of an elliptical path at a rate determined by "equal areas in equal times". Newton was able to show after the fact that an inverse square central force law was consistent with this.
 
Hansa said:
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
According to a recent book, On the Shoulders of Giants, edited by Stephen Hawking, Kepler was hired by Tycho Brahe, who was an expert naked eye astronomer, to make sense of his observations of Mars. That was when Kepler found the planet was describing an ellipse.
 
  • #10
I think Kepler not just get data from Thycho, but Kepler continue Thycho's work
 
  • #11
Kepler continued to work in Tycho's observatory, but he had poor vision (relatively poor, near sighted, could read w/o difficulty) and could not really use any of the instruments. And Galileo's telescope was starting to be distributed so that Tycho's tools were obsolete within a few years of his death as well. Everyone WANTED to believe orbits were perfectly circular or were composed of epicircles (circles within circles). This idea could replicate the orbit of Mars to a very close approximation. Kepler also did NOT want to accept Tycho's observations, but knew Tycho was too good of an observer to not use his data.
 
  • #12
Hansa said:
How did Kepler derive his laws of Planetary Motion without knowing about Newton's law of gravitation? Specifically, the first law of planetary motion which says that planets follow elliptical paths - how did he figure that out without the knowledge of the gravitational pull of the sun? Was it purely based on observations?
The funny thing is that Newton's law of gravitation is also based on observations.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top