Chemistry How Did My Professor Calculate 45 mmoles of Limiting Reagent in a Chemistry Lab?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry lab where the participant is confused about how their professor calculated 45 mmoles of the limiting reagent, assumed to be Na2CO3. The participant initially calculated the mass of Na2CO3 and concluded they had 467 mmoles, which led to confusion about the discrepancy. After some reflection, they realized that the mass of the solution does not equate to the mass of the reagent dissolved, clarifying their misunderstanding. The thread highlights the importance of taking breaks and revisiting problems for better clarity. Ultimately, the participant found resolution through a fresh perspective after a good night's sleep.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm reaady to panic right now so if anyone could please take the time to answer my question I would HUGELY appreciate it! I seriously need to get this done soon as I also have a test tomorrow and i just want to cry because I'm getting nowhere...

We did a lab experiment which involved 50 mL of 1.02 Molar H3PO4. The density was given to be 1.05 g/mL.

We also had 45 mL of 1 Molar Na2CO3 with a density of 1.10 g/mL.

We were asked to find the mass of both solutions. I got 52.5 g of H3PO4 and 49.5 g of Na2CO3.


Our professor gave us the value that there is 45 mmoles of limiting reagent. And I would assume the Na2CO3 is the limiting reagent because there is less of it.

But HOW IN THE WORLD did he get 45 mmoles?

This is how I'm trying to do it:

(49.5 g Na2CO3)/ (106 g Na2CO3)= .467 moles, or 467 mmoles of Na2CO3, and since there are the same number of moles of CO3 2- as Na2CO3, the mmoles of CO3 2- should also be 467 mmoles.

why am i SOOOOO far off?

PLEASE HELP! i have a million questions to do on this lab and i can't even understand why my numbers are the way they are so i can't even start TRYING to answer the questions because I'm so confused...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
OMG nevermind...a million hours later i looked at this again, and i have no idea what i was thinking earlier...

I figured it out...this is why it's good to get a good night's sleep...after a while, even simple things look impossible! hahahah
 
For those looking later at the thread - mass of the solution is NOT mass of the reagent dissolved.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top