How Did Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Address Infinities in Physics?

crisis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm an amateur with some knowledge on the surface and actually am trying to make sense of the history of QM evolution and try to put things in place by trying to understand their 'raison d'être, at the time.
So I'm back in:
1. 1926-28 with the question: how the introduction of Quantum Field solve the problem of QM and relativity with regard to simultaneously.

2. and 20 years later, at Shelter Island, with renormalization-I cannot understand it...how come does the 'forced' introduction of mass and charge resolve the problem of infinity in a satisfying manner?

Any input, links, advise will be highly appreciated,

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crisis said:
with renormalization-I cannot understand it...how come does the 'forced' introduction of mass and charge resolve the problem of infinity in a satisfying manner?

See Chapter B5 ''Divergences and renormalization'' of my theoretical physics FAQ at http://arnold-neumaier.at/physfaq/physics-faq.html#B5
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
16K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top