How Do 38W and 92W Peltier Cells Compare in Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter junkfunkydude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Peltier
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency comparison between 38W and 92W Peltier cells, noting that both have identical dimensions and junction counts, with only a slight temperature differential. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of seller claims and whether material differences, such as Seebeck coefficients, contribute to the efficiency variations. There is also a mention of efficiency loss related to size and the potential benefits of using multiple cells for better performance. The conversation reflects a blend of personal experience with Peltier technology and curiosity about its applications in consumer products. Overall, the efficiency of Peltier cells is influenced by several factors, including material properties and configuration.
junkfunkydude
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A while back, I purchased a 38W peltier cell on ebay. It wasn't powerful enough, so I'm looking at something along the lines of a 92W. I noticed, however that my 38W and the 92W have the same dimensions and the same number of junctions. Also, dT of the 92W is only 1 degree C above the 38W.

How is this possible?
Are the sellers providing false information?
Is one made out of a material with a higher Seebeck coefficient?
If so, will one be more efficient than the other?

Also, a general explanation as to how the different factors effect a cell would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember reading that there is some falloff of efficiency with size and that using multiple cells is a better way to go.
I got my first chip on a 80286 processor cooler (6 mhz:bugeye: ) and been playing with them ever since. I heard that the 08 Chrysler Sebring is coming out with heated and cooled cup holders...I can bet how they're going to do that.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top