How do batteries give the electrons their energy?

AI Thread Summary
Batteries generate energy for electrons through chemical reactions that create an electrical potential difference between electrodes. When electrons flow through a circuit, they lose the energy acquired in the battery, which is initially provided by these reactions. The energy is essentially a result of a microscopic force that pushes the electrons, enabling them to do work. This process is not sustainable indefinitely, as the chemical reactions eventually deplete. Understanding this mechanism is crucial for grasping how batteries function.
sodium.dioxid
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
When a coulomb (of electron) flows through a resistor, it loses the energy it gained in the battery. How were these electrons fueled in the battery in the first place? I already know that chemical reactions rearrange electrons in the battery. But this doesn't directly address the energy gain (voltage) in the battery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a battery, chemical reactions provide for an electrical "potential difference" of the electrodes.
If you are confused, remember that these types of reactions are not perpetually sustainable in a 'closed' system.
They work for a while, then not.
 
Hi sodium.dioxid, welcome to PF

Remember that energy is the capacity to do work and that work is f.d, so fundamentally a battery works by giving a small f over a microscopic d that literally pushes on the electron. That is where the energy comes from, that microscopic push.
 
Sorry guys, I meant to say electric device rather than resistor. Anyway, so they gain chemical energy? But what is that and how do the electrons react to it once they get it.
 
sodium.dioxid said:
Anyway, so they gain chemical energy? But what is that
A microscopic push, as I already mentioned.

sodium.dioxid said:
and how do the electrons react to it once they get it.
They push their neighboring electrons.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top