How Do Bullet Impact and Spring Constants Determine Oscillation Characteristics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biggidy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the oscillation characteristics of a block-spring system after a bullet collides with the block. The user initially calculates the period as approximately 1.2 seconds and estimates the amplitude as 45 cm. However, feedback indicates a misunderstanding of the collision type, suggesting that momentum conservation should be applied instead of assuming an elastic collision. This correction is crucial for accurately determining the post-collision velocity and subsequent oscillation parameters. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct physics principles in solving such problems.
Biggidy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A 4kg block resting on frictionless surface is attached to spring of k=100n/m. A 2g bullet is fired at 100m/s at the block. What is the period and amplitude of oscillations?



2. Homework Equations

1/2mv2 = kinetic energy
1/2kx2 = elastic energy
2 x pi x square root (mass/k) = period

3. The Attempt at a Solution

No answer choices given, just seeing if my thought process is valid.

First, period. 2 x pi x square root (4/100) = 2 x pi x 2/10 = 4pi/10 = approx. 1.2

Next, amplitude. 1/2 (.002g) (100m/s2) = 1/2 100n/m x2
therefore, x equals out to .45, or 45 cm?



Does this make sense, I think I have the period right, but one of my friends got 1 cm for the amplitude and another one of my friends got 0.83 seconds for the period. Any ideas?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's been a mistake.
You took an inelastic collision for a completely elastic one.Instead conserve momentum to find velocity of bullet-block system and then proceed for momentum.
 
That makes great sense. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top