How Do Classical and Modern Physics View Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abejackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity remains a fundamental mystery, with classical mechanics quantifying its effects without explaining its origin, while modern physics, particularly general relativity, describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Classical mechanics views gravity as a force acting at a distance between masses, whereas general relativity introduces a geometric perspective that connects gravity with the fabric of space and time. Despite these advancements, the underlying reasons for gravity's existence are still unknown, and the question of "why" remains largely unanswered. Discussions emphasize the need for precise scientific inquiry, as vague questions can lead to confusion. Ultimately, while theories exist to describe gravity's behavior, the quest for a deeper understanding continues.
abejackson
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Where does the gravity come from? Is it something impossible to answer?
Is there a difference between the classical mechanic's view on gravity and modern physics's view on it? If so how?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I know gravity is just there and we don't know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abejackson said:
As far as I know gravity is just there and we don't know why.

Take my post with a grain of salt, I'm just a high school student.

To the extent of my knowledge, Classical Mechanics only quantifies gravity, and has no explanation as to the why and how.

General Relativity suggests that gravity is an effect of the curvature of spacetime around masses.
 
GuitarStrings said:
Take my post with a grain of salt, I'm just a high school student.

To the extent of my knowledge, Classical Mechanics only quantifies gravity, and has no explanation as to the why and how.

General Relativity suggests that gravity is an effect of the curvature of spacetime around masses.
Yes, that is more or less correct; unlike the classical theory, gravity is the curvature of spacetime in the presence of mass and energy, per Theory of General Relativity. But in either case, scientists do not yet know why, although there are complex equations that explain how. Gravity makes our Universe what it is. Someday, or maybe never, we may know why.
 
@PhanthomJay and @abejackson: If you ask a scientific question you must be very precise about what you ask about. you can't just ask "why?" or say "we don't know why", it is meaningless. Think about, if you think it is nonsense we can talk about it.

In the classical mechanics view, "gravity" is created by chunks of mass and acts without direct contact on other chunks of mass.
In general relativity, "gravity" is basically the same thing but it is modeled by a field and very interesting geometry, which in turn give rise to connection of gravity, space, time and energy. does general relativity answers "why?", it does give a more precise description on gravity and shades light on it's deep connection with space-time but it is not what most people mean when they ask "why?" if fact it is very hard to tell what do they mean!
Another theory is gravitational quantum theory which, very simply put, says that gravity is a force that spreads and is inflicted by particles on other particles... does it answer "why?", or...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top