How Do Classical and Modern Physics View Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abejackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity remains a fundamental mystery, with classical mechanics quantifying its effects without explaining its origin, while modern physics, particularly general relativity, describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Classical mechanics views gravity as a force acting at a distance between masses, whereas general relativity introduces a geometric perspective that connects gravity with the fabric of space and time. Despite these advancements, the underlying reasons for gravity's existence are still unknown, and the question of "why" remains largely unanswered. Discussions emphasize the need for precise scientific inquiry, as vague questions can lead to confusion. Ultimately, while theories exist to describe gravity's behavior, the quest for a deeper understanding continues.
abejackson
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Where does the gravity come from? Is it something impossible to answer?
Is there a difference between the classical mechanic's view on gravity and modern physics's view on it? If so how?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I know gravity is just there and we don't know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abejackson said:
As far as I know gravity is just there and we don't know why.

Take my post with a grain of salt, I'm just a high school student.

To the extent of my knowledge, Classical Mechanics only quantifies gravity, and has no explanation as to the why and how.

General Relativity suggests that gravity is an effect of the curvature of spacetime around masses.
 
GuitarStrings said:
Take my post with a grain of salt, I'm just a high school student.

To the extent of my knowledge, Classical Mechanics only quantifies gravity, and has no explanation as to the why and how.

General Relativity suggests that gravity is an effect of the curvature of spacetime around masses.
Yes, that is more or less correct; unlike the classical theory, gravity is the curvature of spacetime in the presence of mass and energy, per Theory of General Relativity. But in either case, scientists do not yet know why, although there are complex equations that explain how. Gravity makes our Universe what it is. Someday, or maybe never, we may know why.
 
@PhanthomJay and @abejackson: If you ask a scientific question you must be very precise about what you ask about. you can't just ask "why?" or say "we don't know why", it is meaningless. Think about, if you think it is nonsense we can talk about it.

In the classical mechanics view, "gravity" is created by chunks of mass and acts without direct contact on other chunks of mass.
In general relativity, "gravity" is basically the same thing but it is modeled by a field and very interesting geometry, which in turn give rise to connection of gravity, space, time and energy. does general relativity answers "why?", it does give a more precise description on gravity and shades light on it's deep connection with space-time but it is not what most people mean when they ask "why?" if fact it is very hard to tell what do they mean!
Another theory is gravitational quantum theory which, very simply put, says that gravity is a force that spreads and is inflicted by particles on other particles... does it answer "why?", or...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top