MHB How Do Conic Sections Relate to Orbital Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between conic sections derived from a double-napped cone and the energy of orbits under gravitational forces. It highlights how the angle of intersection, denoted as $\alpha$, influences the eccentricity of conic sections, which is mathematically defined. The eccentricity of orbits under gravitational influence is also linked to total energy, angular momentum, and reduced mass, demonstrating a connection between geometric properties and physical dynamics. The conversation raises the possibility of extending this relationship to other types of central forces beyond inverse-square laws. Overall, the mathematical relationship between conic sections and orbital energy is established, suggesting deeper implications in classical physics.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
93
If you think about a double-napped cone, and the various non-degenerate sections you can get with it:

1. Circle
2. Ellipse
3. Parabola
4. Hyperbola,

you can see that there is a progression here: increasing angle $\alpha$ that the intersecting plane makes with the horizontal. To be clear about this, $\alpha$ is not the angle that the normal to the intersecting plane makes with the horizontal, but the angle that the plane itself makes with the horizontal.

It's also true that for an inverse-square-law force, such as gravity (in the classical limit), this same progression describes increasing amounts of energy in the resulting orbit. I've long thought there must be some mathematical relationship between the two. And there is, through the eccentricity. The eccentricity of a conic section is defined as
$$e= \frac{ \sin( \alpha)}{ \sin( \beta)},$$
where $\alpha$ is the angle I've already defined, and $\beta$ is the angle that the cone makes with the horizontal.

According to Marion and Thornton's Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems, 4th Ed., p. 304, Eq. (8.40), you also have that the eccentricity of an orbit under the gravitational force is equal to
$$e= \sqrt{1+ \frac{2E \ell^{2}}{ \mu k}},$$
where $E$ is the total energy, $\ell$ is the angular momentum, $\mu$ is the reduced mass
$$\mu= \frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}},$$
and $k=Gm_{1}m_{2}$ (the numerator of the gravitational force law, although it could also be $q_{1}q_{2}/(4 \pi \epsilon_{0})$, I suppose, for a Coulomb force.)

Hence, we have that
$$ \frac{ \sin^{2}( \alpha)}{ \sin^{2}( \beta)}=1+ \frac{2E \ell^{2}}{ \mu k}.$$
So the relationship between the angle of the conic section and the energy of the orbit is that the square of the sine of the conic section angle is affinely related to the total energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thanks @Ackbach, what math forum can we move this to?
I would say Classical Physics.
 
I wonder if there is a similar relationship, more general, for any central force instead of specifically an inverse-square central force.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top