How do different types of nasal sprays work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mycotheology
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on various types of nasal sprays and their effectiveness for treating nasal issues such as congestion, runny nose, and itchiness. Saline sprays are noted to be ineffective for the user, failing to alleviate any symptoms. Steroid sprays provide relief from itchiness but do not address congestion or runny nose, raising questions about their impact on mucus production. Xylomethazoline sprays are effective for decongestion but can cause rebound congestion and do not help with itchiness or runny nose. Antihistamine and anticholinergic sprays are mentioned as potential solutions for itchiness and chronic runny nose, respectively, with inquiries about their specific mechanisms and effectiveness.
mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
This thread is about nasal sprays, not tablets. I'm always having problems with nasal infections so I want to learn the pharmacology behind the sprays. Firstly, there are 3 types of problems I have with the nose. Congestion (by far the worst), runny nose and itchiness. I'll list the ones I know of, can you inform me about exactly how they work.

Saline sprays:
I know that salt kills bacteria so they should help sterilize the nose. They do absolutely nothing for me. They don't remedy congestion, runny nose or itchiness. I don't understand how they are supposed to decongest the nose either.

Steroid sprays:
These don't decongest my nose at all either. I know steroids are antiinflammatories but what else do they do? Do they stop itchiness? My nose was itching like mad so I decided to try the steroid spray (had been lying in my drawer since I thought it was useless) and its not itching anymore. Seems to have worked. I thought only antihistamines could prevent itching.

What about runny nose? Do steroid sprays lower mucus production?

Xylomethazoline sprays:
As a nasal decongestant, this works amazingly well for me. I know how this one works, its an adrenaline agonist and thus, causes the blood vessels in the nose to constrict. It also causes rebound congestion though so its not an ideal decongestant. I believe pseudoephedrine can also be used locally in the same way. These sprays don't remedy the itchiness or runny nose at all though.

Heres some ones I just read about but have never tried:
Antihistamine sprays:
I want one of these because if I use xylomethazoline to decongest my nasal passages, then the itchiness comes back with a vengeance and I start sneezing like mad. Do antihistamines also help decongest the nasal passages? What about mucus production? Will these remedy a runny nose?

Anticholinergic sprays:
I have no idea how these might work. I here:
http://allergies.about.com/od/noseandsinusallergies/a/nasalsprays.htm
that they dry up nasal secretions so it sounds like these are the sprays to use if your problem is a chronic runny nose. Is that their sole purpose then, to prevent mucus production?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
you are pretty on all accounts with the drugs. Steroids will suppress the immune system. saline spray, i don't think they ever worked for me either, don't think there is any reason behind it's mechanism. If you had an infection in the nose washing it won't kill it completely.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top