B How Do Discrete Derivatives and Integrals Work in Calculus?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter ForceBoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Discrete
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying calculus concepts to discrete functions, specifically defining discrete derivatives and integrals. The discrete derivative is expressed as Δ_n f(n) = f(n+1) - f(n), while the discrete integral is defined as the sum from a to b of f(n). A participant initially struggled to prove the sum formula for a geometric series, encountering errors in their calculations and definitions. After reevaluating their approach and explicitly defining the limits of their sum, they successfully derived the correct formula. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in definitions and limits when working with discrete calculus.
ForceBoy
Messages
47
Reaction score
6
Hello all. I've come across some math which consists of just applying the basic ideas of calculus (derivatives and integrals) onto discrete functions. (The link: http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/DCalc.pdf )

The discrete derivative with respect to n is defined as ## \Delta_n f(n) = f(n+1) - f(n) ## in the document. The discrete integral is defined as ##\sum_{n: a \rightarrow b} f(n) = f(a)+f(a+1)+ ...+f(b-1) ##.

It had been a few months since I had read this article so when I started exploring this math, I defined the discrete integral as the regular sum, from a to b ( ##\sum_{n= a}^{b} f(n) = f(a)+f(a+1)+ ...+f(b) ## ). For this reason, I found it best to define the discrete integral as ## \Delta_n f(n) = f(n) - f(n-1) ##
The Fundamental Theorem:

## \Delta_n F(n) = f(n) \leftrightarrow \sum_{n=a}^{b} f(n) = F(b)-F(a-1) ##
I did a few problems and everything worked out well when I didn't make any errors. However, just now I was trying to prove

##\sum_{n} a^{n} = \frac{a^{n+1}-1}{a-1}##

but couldn't seem to. My work was as follows:

##\sum_{n} a^{n} ##

## u = a^{n} ##

##\Delta_u = (a^{n}-a^{n-1})*\Delta_n##

## \Delta_u = a^{n-1}(a-1) * \Delta_n ##

## \frac{\Delta_u*a^{1-n}}{a-1} = \Delta_n ##

## \frac{a}{a^{n}(a-1)}*\Delta_u = \Delta_n ##

So I then make the substitutions

##\sum_{u} u*\frac{a}{a^{n}(a-1)} ##

##\sum_{u} u*\frac{a}{u(a-1)} ##

##\sum_{u} \frac{a}{(a-1)} ##

I can then bring out that fraction

##\frac{a}{(a-1)} \sum_{u} 1 ##

##***## ##\sum_{k} 1 = k ## ## ***##

##\frac{a}{(a-1)} u ##

##\frac{a}{(a-1)} a^{n} ##

And in the end:

##\frac{a^{k+1}}{a-1} ##

so

##\sum_{n} a^{n} = \frac{a^{k+1}}{a-1} ##

but

##\frac{a^{k+1}}{a-1} \not= \frac{a^{n+1}-1}{a-1}##

Somewhere I've made a mistake. If someone could either point it out for me or guide me to it, it would be greatly appreciated. Also, if my reasoning in someplace isn't clear, please tell me and I'll explain.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your sum index seems to run from 0 to n, or at least that would result in ##\sum_{n} a^{n} = \frac{a^{k+1}}{a-1}##. The problem could be in one of two places, 1) your new definition of the discrete integral, or 2) the fact that you have not explicitly defined the limits of your sum.
 
The equation I was solving was meant to be analogous to solving an indeterminate integral. For this reason I never really established my limits. Since you brought this to my attention I decided to evaluate the sum from 0 to n. I then used the equation I had gotten and the fundamental theorem:

## \sum_{k=0}^{n} a^{k} = \frac{a^{n+1}}{a-1} - \frac{a^{(0-1)+1}}{a-1} = \frac{a^{n+1} -1}{a-1} ##

So I got what I wanted. Thank you for your time. I now see where the error was. Have a good day!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top