How Do Electric Fields Interact at Specific Points on the Y-Axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field on the y-axis due to two positive point charges located on the x-axis. The participants emphasize the importance of considering the direction of the electric field vectors, specifically how the x-components of the fields from both charges cancel each other out. To accurately determine the total electric field, one must calculate the unit vectors pointing from each charge to the point on the y-axis. The correct approach involves expressing these unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates before summing the electric fields. Understanding these vector components is crucial for arriving at the correct answer.
nemzy
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Two 2.06e-6 C point charges are located on the x axis. One is at 1.06 M and the other is at -1.06 M

(a) Determine the electric field on the y-axis at .48 M

This is how i did it:

Etotal=sum of E vectors...

E=ke*q/r^2

r^2=1.06^2+.48^2

q=2.06e-6

E1 = Ke*q/(1.06^2+.48^2)
E2= same thing

E1+E2 = total..
answer is wrong..what am i doing wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both charges are positive. The electric field equation is given by

Kq/r^2 * r-hat, which is a unit vector pointing radially away from the charge.

If you draw a picture of the two e-fields, you'll see that the components don't add exactly (in fact, the x components cancel out), so you need to take that into account.
 
yeah when i was trying to do this i just realized that too..but i still don't nkow how to find the electric field
 
You should ask yourself: what is the unit vector, r-hat, that points from the point charge to the coordinate in consideration?

IE, for one point charge, what is the unit vector that points from (1.06, 0) to (0, 0.48)? Knowing this, you can express the unit vector r, in terms of cartesian coordinates, and you should see, that when you add the E-fields together, the x-hat components cancel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top