Schools How do grad schools perceive a course audit on an undergrad transcript?

AI Thread Summary
Auditing a course, such as "Science and Religion," can be a beneficial way to engage with interesting material without the pressure of completing assignments. Graduate schools typically focus on more significant factors for admissions, including GPA, GRE scores, and relevant work or research experience, rather than the presence of audited courses on a transcript. Auditing may not negatively impact an application, and it's suggested that students consider taking graded upper-level or graduate courses in their field for a more favorable evaluation. Engaging with professors about sitting in on classes can also provide similar intellectual benefits without the stress of formal auditing.
chickenwing71
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking of auditing a course this Fall, since I find it very interesting and would love to take it, but I don't have time to do the homework and papers and such. It's called "Science and Religion" and is just a two hour lecture every Wednesday evening. What would a graduate school think of an audit like this? My school lists an audited course on your transcript if you attend >50% of the classes. There are some other philosophy courses I might also consider auditing at other points in my education.

EDIT: I'm hoping to apply to graduate school in either physics or engineering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a former member of an admissions committee, I would say it would have no effect. There are just so many other factors that get weighed in: GPA, GPA in major, GRE scores, work/research experience (as should be documented in letters of recommendation)... it's rather like taking a course in underwater basket weaving.

Note: it you do have the time, take more (graded) upper-level and even grad-level courses in your field. That can be weighted positively by a reader's score.
 
I did a Major in Honours Physics and a Minor in World Religions, one of my undergrad courses was in fact "Science and Religion". I had no problem getting into Grad Schools.
 
Thanks. I'm not afraid I would have trouble getting in because I took a certain course - I just wanted to make sure there's no negative stereotype of auditing courses instead of earning credits for them.
 
If its any help I also audited a graduate level Magnetism course because I didn't want the stress of all the work while taking a full course load.
 
You know, you could simply ask the professor if you can sit in on the class. You get the same intellectual benefit out of it, without the papers and such.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top