How do I calculate the diameter of the sun's image using two lenses in optics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter T7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Optics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the diameter of the sun's image using a lens with a focal length of 0.5m and an angular width of 0.5 degrees, the formula d = f * tan(0.5°) can be applied. For the second part involving an astronomical telescope, the first lens forms an image at its focal point, which then serves as the object for the eyepiece lens. The telescope configuration requires that the final rays emerging from the eyepiece are parallel, indicating that the image formed by the objective must be at the focal plane of the eyepiece. This setup allows for viewing distant stars with a relaxed eye, ensuring the final image appears at infinity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the image characteristics in optics.
T7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have an optics Q here I'm not quite sure about:-

a.) An astronomers uses a single thin lens of focal length 0.5m to form a sharp image of the sun on a white screen. If the angular width of the sun is 0.5 degrees, what is the diameter of the sun's image.

b.) At night the astronomer uses the same lens to collect light from some stars, but not the screen is no longer used, and the light it permitted to pass through where the screen had been and through an eyepiece lens that acts as a magnifying glass to view the stars' images. The eyepiece lens has a focal length of 20mm, and the pair of lenses is an astronomical telescope. Assuming that the instrument is to be used with a relaxed eye, determine from a suitably labelled ray diagram the angular magnification effected by the telescope's optics. Is the final image erect or inverted?​

For the first part I would say that, at that distance, the rays from the sun striking the lens will be parallel to one another and will converge at some point from the lens equal in distance to the focal length of the lens, forming an image of height h. I presume I could then say that tan 0.5 = h / f, so the diameter is ftan 0.5.

For the second part, however, another lens is introduced. Am I to suppose that the image formed by the first is striking the second at a distance of 0m (?!)

I'm not entirely sure where to go from there to finish off the Q. Any help appreciated.

Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can give some hints:

1. The first lense is the second lense's focal point
2. "To be used by a relaxed eye" means that b (the distanse from the stars to the lins should be \infty (infinity)
3. The astronomical telescope consist of 2 positive lenses and is also known as a Kepler telescope, try and google that for the ray diagram
 
Last edited:
1. The image of the sun will for in the focal plane of the lens. Also the angle that it subtends (the image) is the same angle as the real sun - see the attachment. So you are correct in saying that \tan(0.5^o)=\frac{d}{f}.
 
Last edited:
The rays from the star falling on the objective will actually be parallel to each other if the drawing was to scale. Again the image forms at the focal plane of the objective. The statement "used with a relaxed eye" implies that the final rays emerging from the eyepiece need to be parallel giving an image at infinity. The first image formed by the objective therefore needs to be in the focal plane of the eyepiece to accomplish this.
 

Attachments

  • astronomical telescope.gif
    astronomical telescope.gif
    13.4 KB · Views: 633
Ah, now I see.

Thanks folks. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top