How do I calculate the equivalence capacitance of this circuit?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the equivalent capacitance of the given circuit with capacitors C1 = 8.65 μF, C2 = 4.00 μF, C3 = 8.55 μF, and C4 = 3.20 μF, the user attempted various configurations but expressed confusion over the arrangement. The correct approach involves recognizing that C1 and C2 are in series, which leads to the equation 1/(1/C1 + 1/C2) for their combined capacitance. This result should then be added to the capacitances of C3 and C4, which are in parallel. The user also faced difficulties accessing the circuit diagram link, prompting suggestions for alternative ways to share the image. Clarification on the circuit arrangement is essential for accurate calculations.
Bishop556
Messages
37
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


http://loncapa2.fsu.edu/enc/66/45d3639022485d2ba995cf84c579b584bffe5ace9851f3da3fbac5f5a1c7d2ee9dfed8743cf75459ef336ad7a1bbe176f7a0cf1a35a519ce0cef3c31febf9858404cac5a2cd3ace3851dbef61ee03a25f7a5c41a87b32e0f.gif

Calculate the equivalence capacitance of the circuit shown in the diagram above; where C1 = 8.65 μF, C2 = 4.00 μF, C3 = 8.55 μF, C4 = 3.20 μF.


Homework Equations



Capacitance in a series: 1/Ctot = Ʃ(1/C)

Capacitance in parallel: Ctot = ƩC

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I attempted multiple ways to order each capacitor into a way to solve a formula. In my sixth attempt I presumed that C1 and C2 are in a series and are parallel to C3. I also believe C4 is parallel to C3, so here is my equation:

C = (1/C1 + 1/C2) + C3 + C4

Another idea that came into ferment was the concept of thinking that C2 and C3 are in series and are parallel to C1. C4 would be parallel to C2 and C3 so:

C = C1 + (1/C2 + 1/C3) + C4

I could go on, but since my professor never went over this I am thoroughly confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show the circuit diagram, please.

ehild
 
If you can't see it on the thread, then here is the link:

http://loncapa2.fsu.edu/enc/66/45d3639022485d2ba995cf84c579b584bffe5ace9851f3da3fbac5f5a1c7d2ee9dfed8743cf75459ef336ad7a1bbe176f7a0cf1a35a519ce0cef3c31febf9858404cac5a2cd3ace3851dbef61ee03a25f7a5c41a87b32e0f.gif
 
I can not open the link. It is not safe.

Anyway, the equation you wrote "C = (1/C1 + 1/C2) + C3 + C4" is wrong.
The resultant of the series capacitors is 1/(1/C1+1/C2).

ehild
 
I can't see image by either method.

Suggest you upload as an attachment?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top