How do I determine orthogonal eigenvectors for a repeated eigenvalue?

J.Asher
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is an Hamiltonian operation which is given by
(2 1 1)
(1 2 1) = H ; 3-by-3 matrix
(1 1 2)
And let's have an arbtrary eigenvector
(a)
(b) = v ; (3x1) matrix
(c)

Then, from the characteristic equation, the eigenvalues are 1,4. Here eigenvalue 1 is
repeated one.

Homework Equations


Now, my question arises. I know that the eigenvectors that corresponds to eigenvalue 1 is two and both are orthgonal to each other. However, I can't find any of them because when
I substitute eigenvalue into 1, I get a kind of meaningless(?) equation,

(2 1 1) (a) (a)
(1 2 1) (b) = (b)
(1 1 2) (c) (c) .

And it gives 3-equivalent equation, a+b+c = 0
I couldn't determine any relation between a,b,c.


The Attempt at a Solution



So I quess that do I have to choose a,b,c satisfying the condition a+b+c=0
but still problem doesn't disappear beacuse there would be a lot of soulutions...

What did I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't take it far enough.

a + b + c = 0 ==>
a = -b - c
b = b
c = ... c

The eigenvectors form a two-dimensional subspace of R3 that is spanned by two vectors. If you look closely at the system above, you can pick out the two vectors. These two vectors are linearly independent but they don't happen to be orthogonal.
 
The operator we handle is Hermitian since Hamlitonian is real physical operator.
it is no doubt that the eigenvectors of the Hermitian is orthogonal.
Actually I cannot understand what you are saying. What do you mean by that?
...??
 
J.Asher said:
The operator we handle is Hermitian since Hamlitonian is real physical operator.
it is no doubt that the eigenvectors of the Hermitian is orthogonal.
Actually I cannot understand what you are saying. What do you mean by that?
...??

If it's hermitian the eigenvectors belonging to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal. Eigenvectors belonging to the same eigenvalue don't have to be. You have to select them to be orthogonal.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top