How do I graph an absolute value inequality in 2 variables?

Triggy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need some help graphing an Absolute value. I know what it look like from a graphing calculator but I don't understand how to get to the answer.

http://media.twango.com/m1/original/0042/5fda15431b96400eb32e66afa3627624.jpg

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With one like that the best method is to break it into regions. Just get a simple linear function for each of the following three regions and you're done.

1. x < -1
2. -1 <= x <= 1
3. x > 1
 
Following uart, adhere to this algorithm when doing abs.val problems:
1. Determine the zeros of each absolute value term, and mark these off on a number line.
2.Within each region, every absolute value term is now easily converted into a non-absolute-alue term
3. Simplify the expresion you have gotten for each interval, and draw that portion of the graph.
4. Iterate with the next region.
 
graphing inequalities in 2 variables

Triggy,

You can plot your inequality on www.webgraphing.com. There, you will get both the plot of the curve and the region where the inequality holds. Just use the link to "Inequality Graphing in Two Variables." To represent |x|, use the notation abs(x).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top