How do i know there is always an aerodynamic center?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaNiEl!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the aerodynamic center (AC) in airplane stability, particularly its theoretical and experimental foundations. It is noted that under ideal conditions, such as inviscid and incompressible flow, a mathematical basis exists for the AC, suggesting it is a consistent point on airfoils. However, when considering real-world scenarios governed by the Navier-Stokes equations, the existence of a fixed AC becomes problematic, especially at varying angles of attack (AOA) and near transonic speeds. The conversation also touches on the idea of "moving AC," which reflects the dynamic nature of airflow and stability analysis. Overall, the AC concept is both theoretical and practical, depending on the flow conditions and assumptions made.
DaNiEl!
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hi
i'm still learning these basic concepts of airplane stability, specifically the aerodynamic center, the point about which the pitching moment does not vary with AOA. i just wanted to know if there is a theoretical basis for this, or if it is just experimental. is there some sort of "mathematical" proof for the fact that there exists such a point on all airfoils?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you mean by "theoretical basis". If the flow is assumed inviscid, incompressible, irrotational, i.e. representable by linear potential equation, and the airfoil something akin to a thin plate, then, if I remember correctly, it mathematically drops down to existence of such a point.

On the other hand, if you think realism, full Navier-Stokes[*] equations, then there is no such point in general. For example, think of an airfoil at near-transonic Mach number at zero AOA; it's AC is at ~25% chord, but, as the AOA increases, the flow will become transonic, shock forming on the upper surface, which will very much change the AC and everything else.

So, physically, I'd say AC ranks as much theoretical as the C_l = a_0 (\alpha - \alpha_0) relation. However, in stability and other analysis concerning time-dependent, oscillatory effects, frequently the concept of "linearization about a point" is invoked. So you could also think of AC as property of the current AOA, as if the flow were behaving "linearly" for small perturbations of AOA around the current. This leads to mention of "moving AC", which by itself sounds as an oxymoron.

* Not even the existence of solution of NS equations has been proven, hence any aerodynamics result for NS-governed flow cannot be considered theoretical in the mathematics/physics sense.

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top