How do I operate exponents on fractions?

Deagonx
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm rather confused on how to operate exponents on fractions. For example

(4/3)^-1

or

(4/3)^1

Please explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Exponents on fractions work the same as on non-fractional quantities.

Thus, (4/3)^1 = 4/3; (4/3)^2 = 16/9 , etc.

(4/3)^-1 = 1/(4/3) = 3/4; (4/3)^-2 = 1/(4/3)^2 = 9/16, etc.
 
You could distribute the exponent into the parentheses to both the numerator and denominator of the fraction. For example:

\frac{4^-^1}{3^-^1} = \frac{\frac{1}{4}}{\frac{1}{3}}}

Now multiply the fraction in the numerator by \frac{3}{3} and the fraction in the denominator by \frac{4}{4}

This will yield the fraction \frac{\frac{3}{12}}{\frac{4}{12}}

Finally, multiply both the numerator and denominator by 12, which will yield the final fraction of \frac{3}{4}

If you plug (\frac{4}{3})^-^1 into your calculator, you will get the fraction \frac{3}{4}

I hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
844
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top