How do I reverse the pattern of a LED ligt?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darkflame808
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led Reverse
AI Thread Summary
To reverse the LED pattern in an alarm system, a circuit can be designed using a transistor to control a second LED that behaves oppositely to the first. When the first LED is lit, the transistor will be activated, turning the second LED off, and vice versa when the first LED is off. This setup allows for a bright LED to signal an alert without the distraction of a constantly lit indicator. Resistors will be needed to manage current flow to the LEDs and the transistor. Implementing a transistor inverter circuit is recommended for achieving this functionality effectively.
Darkflame808
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have an ackward question.

I've been trying to device a circuit to reverse the pattern of a LED.

Let me give you a quick rundown of my situation and my goal.

As it stands now.

Imagine a an alarm system. When activated a LED is lit 24/7. When a switch is triggered the led will blink off,on,off,on,off,on until the switch is deactivated in which case it will resume to the permanently on status.

I want to use the signal of this led +12v to control a transistor to do the opposite with a second LED.

When this LED is on, the second LED is off. When the switch is triggered, the voltage cut from the first LED will cause the second LED to turn on.

Basically I'm trying to see if there is a way to make it so LED #2 acts in the exact opposite of LED #1.

I can power LED #2 from a separate source of power. LED #1 is powered from a 12v circuit, led #2 is also 12V (can be same circuit or difference 12V no matter to me)

Does anyone understand my goal? It's kinda complicated to explain.

I'm trying to avoid having to stare at a bright led when it's armed constantly but still have it flicker (even if backwards to the orignal led) when triggered. Doing this I can hide the first led out of sight but still retain the same alarm alert using the second LED.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The simplest way to establish this complementary function is to have an LED (and resistor) in parallel with the other branch, except that the LED is turned around from the other. In this way, the first LED is on when the second is off, and vice-versa. This only works if there's enough driving current (which, given that most alarm systems are powered off of higher-current sourcing microcontrollers, is usually okay--or at least worth a try).

I'll try to represent that here with a diode as -|>- and resistor as -\/\/\-

Output:
o---|>----\/\/\---------o GND
| |
|--<|----\/\/\------|

Additionally, if it's just the LED intensity that bothers you, and you have some soldering expertise (and the alarm unit uses decent-sized components), you can just solder a larger resistor value to limit current going to the LED.
 
actually its the opposite. I want to put a really bright led to get my attention. but don't want the constant on status to be a distraction.

I am at work so I don't quite see what your trying to explain. someone at work read my post and he said I made it sound way too complicated for what I want to achieve. he told me I should word it this way.

I want to use voltages as a switch. when 12v is present on a line the switch is open. when there is no voltage on the line then the switch is closed.
I can draw a schematic to better explain tomorrow when I can access my tablet. just picture a square circuit. 4 sides.

each side is a component.
1. power
2.led
3.resistor
4. switch.

I want to replace switch with something controlled by voltage. (transistor? )
if voltage is present it is open. if voltage is not present it is closed.

I thought about what you wrote but I am not sure how to implement that. I think I need to get that schematic up on here.

thanks!
 
Here's basically what I mean. In circuit #1, the two wires coming out of it is currently hooked up to a LED that is driven by 12 volts.

I want to make the LED behave in the exact opposite. When the controller turns on the LED by turning on the +12V line, I want an LED to actually turn off. When the controller turns off the +12v line to turn the LED off, I want my led to turn on. Complete reversal of the function the controller intended me to "see".

Thanks! I really hope my chicken scratch is legible.

My electronics skills are pretty much 1990's so bear with me if things don't make sense. I think you'll catch my drift.

Aloha!
 

Attachments

  • How do I make the voltage on #1 be a switch for.JPG
    How do I make the voltage on #1 be a switch for.JPG
    50 KB · Views: 480
Since you want to use a bright LED for the inverted function, it will help to add a transistor buffer to do the inversion. Do a web search on "transistor inverter" to see the basic circuit. Here's a crude ascii diagram:

V+
|
<
> R1
<
|--------------
/ |
S--^v^-- | T1 |
R2 \ #
| # LED
| #
| |
vv vv

S is the input signal, R1 and R2 are appropriate resistors to limit collector and base current. T1 is an NPN transistor, e.g 2N2222. # is your bright LED.

When the signal is high, the transistor is on, taking all the LED current, so the LED is off. When signal is low, the transistor is off, and the LED gets the current/voltage, so is on.
 
Since you want to use a bright LED for the inverted function, it will help to add a transistor buffer to do the inversion. Do a web search on "transistor inverter" to see the basic circuit.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top