How do I solve for arc length?

AI Thread Summary
To solve for arc length, the Weierstrass substitution, also known as trigonometric substitution, is a useful method. This technique transforms the integral into a more manageable form, often using the "t-formula." Users are encouraged to research these terms in calculus resources for a clearer understanding. The discussion highlights a common confusion regarding terminology in mathematical substitutions. Understanding these concepts is essential for effectively calculating arc lengths.
silverbabe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
How do I solve this ?
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Weierstrass substitution.
 
i.e. a trig substitution.
 
I didn't know that was called Weierstrass substitution. I've always known it as "t-formula".
 
okay... I´m lost!
 
Silverbabe, search for "Weierstrass substitution" or "trigonometric substitution" in your calculus book, library, the Internet, or Wikipedia, and you'll find out what it means
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top