Looking for intuition on differentials and arc length

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of differentials and arc length in calculus, specifically focusing on the differential of arc length and its implications in understanding curves. Participants explore the mathematical notation and its geometric interpretations, as well as the application of these concepts in practical problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of the differential of an arc length, indicating confusion about its implications.
  • Another participant presents the mathematical expression for the differential arc length, relating it to the Pythagorean theorem.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between small changes in x (dx) and the corresponding changes in y (dy), questioning how these relate to the arc length.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the notation and its consistency, feeling distracted by the changing symbols.
  • There is a discussion about the difference between using the differential form (ds) and the integral form for calculating arc length, with some participants questioning the necessity of the differential approach.
  • One participant mentions that the differential represents an infinitesimal change in length along the curve, emphasizing its dependence on both dx and dy.
  • Another participant points out that the integral for arc length is derived from the general formula involving ds, which is defined geometrically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the notation and concepts involved. While some agree on the geometric interpretations, others remain uncertain about the necessity and application of differentials in calculating arc length. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the notation and its application, indicating that the discussion is rooted in foundational calculus concepts. There are unresolved questions about the clarity and consistency of mathematical expressions used in the discussion.

opus
Gold Member
Messages
717
Reaction score
131
Please see the attached image. It's a part of a study guide for my final, but I didn't put it in the homework section because I already got the answer, I just don't know what it means.
The question has to do with the differential of an arc length. I made some drawings to see if I could make some sense out of it but I don't think I'm quite there.

So when we're talking about the differential of an arc length, what exactly does this mean?
Screen Shot 2018-12-09 at 7.06.17 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-12-09 at 7.06.17 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-12-09 at 7.06.17 PM.png
    29.3 KB · Views: 615
Physics news on Phys.org
##d\vec s=dx~\hat i+dy~\hat j##
##ds =\sqrt{d\vec s \cdot d\vec s}=\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dy)^2}=dx\sqrt{1+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2}##
What's ##(\frac{dy}{dx})^2~?##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
Apologies, but I don't understand the notation. This is for Calculus I if that gives an idea. It does look like you're doing something with Pythagorean's though!
 
Sorry, I thought you understood vectors. Yes, it has to do with the Pythagorean theorem. A two dimensional displacement ##ds## has a horizontal part ##dx## and a vertical part ##dy##. The two form a right triangle and ##ds=\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dy)^2}## is the hypotenuse.
 
Ok that's much more clear, thanks!
So then, since our ##dx## is extremely small, we can pretty much say that the curve of the graph is a straight line in that ##dx##.
This would give us a right triangle with the base as ##dx##, the hypotenuse as ##ds##, and the side length as what? It would have to be the change in y values corresponding the the change in x values (##dx##), but in terms of notation, what would this be?
 
Look at post #2. If ##ds =dx\sqrt{1+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2}##, what is ##ds## when ##y=2\sqrt{5x+1}?##
 
##ds=dx\sqrt{\frac{5x+26}{5x+1}}##?
 
Right. Does this answer your original question or is there more to it?
 
I guess I don't understand what the question is really asking me, so I suppose there's more to it. In words, how would you ask the given question to me? For example, "here is a function, what is it doing from here to here?"
 
  • #10
The question is asking you to find ##ds## if ##y=2\sqrt{5x+1}## and you have done that. How would you approach the following problem:
You drive your car from x = 10 units to x = 40 units along the curve given by ##y=2\sqrt{5x+1}##. How much distance has been added to your car's odometer?
 
  • #11
The distance added to the odometer would be equal to the length of the curve, which is Arc Length ##= \int_{10}^{40} \sqrt{\frac{5x+26}{5x+1}}dx## which is a specific integral to the more general ##s(x)## or ##ds## too. I guess this notation is throwing me for barrel rolls. It keeps changing and I think it's distracting me from the picture.
 
  • #12
opus said:
The distance added to the odometer would be equal to the length of the curve, which is Arc Length ##= \int_{10}^{40} \sqrt{\frac{5x+26}{5x+1}}dx## which is a specific integral to the more general ##s(x)## or ##ds## too. I guess this notation is throwing me for barrel rolls. It keeps changing and I think it's distracting me from the picture.
It's standard notation, it's part of "the picture" and eventually you will get used to it (I hope).
 
  • #13
So then ##ds## is saying the change in the function ##s(x)## which is a function that gives the arc length of the function ##y##. Why are we putting it in terms of ##ds##? Why are we concerned with change at all when we are looking for the length of a curve? We had a perfectly good way to find the length when we had the formula ##s(x) = \int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{\frac{5t+26}{5t+1}}dt## What's the difference?
 
  • #14
opus said:
So then ##ds## is saying the change in the function ##s(x)## which is a function that gives the arc length of the function ##y##. Why are we putting it in terms of ##ds##? Why are we concerned with change at all when we are looking for the length of a curve? We had a perfectly good way to find the length when we had the formula ##s(x) = \int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{\frac{5t+26}{5t+1}}dt## What's the difference?
When you get to differential geometry, several basic formulas are expressed in terms of ds.

Also, check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_length.
 
  • #15
opus said:
So then ##ds## is saying the change in the function ##s(x)## which is a function that gives the arc length of the function ##y##. Why are we putting it in terms of ##ds##? Why are we concerned with change at all when we are looking for the length of a curve? We had a perfectly good way to find the length when we had the formula ##s(x) = \int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{\frac{5t+26}{5t+1}}dt## What's the difference?
Suppose someone asked you to find the length of the curve represented by the polynomial ##y=x^4+3x^3+6x## from ##x=0## to ##x=8##. What then? No formula is given to you and clearly you can't use ##s(x) = \int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{\frac{5t+26}{5t+1}}dt##. This example shows how to derive and apply the appropriate formula.
 
  • #16
opus said:
This is for Calculus I if that gives an idea. It does look like you're doing something with Pythagorean's though!
Exactly.
opus said:
So then ##ds## is saying the change in the function ##s(x)## which is a function that gives the arc length of the function ##y##. Why are we putting it in terms of ##ds##? Why are we concerned with change at all when we are looking for the length of a curve? We had a perfectly good way to find the length when we had the formula ##s(x) = \int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{\frac{5t+26}{5t+1}}dt## What's the difference?
ds represents an infinitesimal change in the length along the curve. This length depends on both dx and dy, not just dx.
The formula for s(x) that you show is not a general formula for arc length. This integral comes from the general formula for arc length, in which ds is defined as the hypotenuse on a right triangle whose legs are dx and dy.

Here's a picture.
arclength.png

So ##ds^2 = dx^s + dy^2##, or ##ds = \sqrt{dx^s + dy^2}##. This latter equation can take different forms, using algebraic manipulations. One form is ##ds = \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2}~dx##, if y is given as a function of x. Another form has ##1 + \left( \frac{dx}{dy}\right)^2## inside the radical, for when x is given as a function of y.
 

Attachments

  • arclength.png
    arclength.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 576
Last edited:
  • #17
The differential is the approximation to the change of the function along the tangent line ( Or, in higher dimension the tangent plane, etc.).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K