How Do I Solve for h2 in This Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willwoll100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
willwoll100
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I know that a lot of people are going to be thinking that I'm really thick but for some reason I can't re-arrange the equation below what I want to find out is the value of h2. If anyone could help I would be very grateful

0.87 = -7.0599/191.83-h2

Thanks again and I feel sooooooo stupid

Will
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it
0.87 = -\frac{7.0599}{191.83}-h2

Or
0.87 = -\frac{7.0599}{191.83-h2}


heck it is an easy pro
[zz)]

for 1) 0.87 = -0.0368-h2
for 2) -7.0599/0.87 = 191.83-h2
 
Last edited:
Its the second one
But its just the 7.0599 that's negative

Will
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by willwoll100
Its the second one
But its just the 7.0599 that's negative

Will
Yes it is Haven't u reached the conclusion yet[?]
 
Since 0.87 = -\frac{7.0599}{191.83-h2},

(0.87)(1.91.83- h2)= -7.0599.

Can you do it from there?
 
Sorry that I didn't replay earlier as I've been having trouble with my ISP, thanks for everyones help and I did manage to solve it

Will
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top