I How Do Indices Determine Positions in a Quantum Density Matrix?

doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18
I am reading Leonard Susskind's Theoretical Minimum book on Quantum Mechanics. Excercise 7.4 is as follows:

Calculate the density matrix for ##|\Psi\rangle = \alpha|u\rangle + \beta|d\rangle##.

Answer:
$$ \psi(u) = \alpha, \quad \psi^*(u) = \alpha^* \\
\psi(d) = \beta, \quad \psi^*(d) = \beta^*\\
\rho_{a'a} = \begin{pmatrix}
\alpha^*\alpha & \alpha^*\beta \\
\beta^*\alpha & \beta^*\beta
\end{pmatrix}$$

From my understanding, if we use ##\rho_{a'a} = \psi(a')\psi^*(a)##, then I notice that the matrix is equivalent to:

$$\rho_{a'a} = \begin{pmatrix}
\psi^*(u)\psi(u) & \psi^*(u)\psi(d) \\
\psi^*(d)\psi(u) & \psi^*(d)\psi(d)
\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}
\rho_{uu} & \rho_{du} \\
\rho_{ud} & \rho_{dd}
\end{pmatrix}
$$

I was wondering how the indices affect the position of each ##\rho_{a'a}## in the density matrix.

In other words, why is the matrix not:

$$
\rho_{a'a} = \begin{pmatrix}
\alpha^*\alpha & \beta^*\alpha \\
\alpha^*\beta & \beta^*\beta
\end{pmatrix}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it is not defined that way and because it is not symmetric (it is Hermitian).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Orodruin said:
Because it is not defined that way and because it is not symmetric (it is Hermitian).

But both matrices are Hermitian, would it be defined such that:

$$\rho_{aa'} = \begin{pmatrix}
\rho_{11} & \rho_{12} \\
\rho_{21} & \rho_{22}
\end{pmatrix}$$

And u would correlate to the 1 while d correlates to the 2, since ##|u\rangle =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 \\
0
\end{pmatrix}## while ##|d\rangle## is orthonormal?
 
The density operator for state ##| \Psi \rangle## is defined as ##\hat{\rho} = | \Psi \rangle \langle \Psi|##. When you go to a density matrix representation, you can choose the order of the components, e.g., for ##|\Phi \rangle = a | u \rangle + b | d \rangle##,
$$
\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix} \mbox{ or }\begin{pmatrix} b \\ a \end{pmatrix}.
$$
Once that order is chosen (the one on the left here), the position of the elements of the density matrix is fixed, so that the result of ##\hat{\rho} |\Phi \rangle## is the same as the corresponding matrix-vector multiplication.
 
  • Like
Likes doggydan42
DrClaude said:
The density operator for state ##| \Psi \rangle## is defined as ##\hat{\rho} = | \Psi \rangle \langle \Psi|##. When you go to a density matrix representation, you can choose the order of the components, e.g., for ##|\Phi \rangle = a | u \rangle + b | d \rangle##,
$$
\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix} \mbox{ or }\begin{pmatrix} b \\ a \end{pmatrix}.
$$
Once that order is chosen (the one on the left here), the position of the elements of the density matrix is fixed, so that the result of ##\hat{\rho} |\Phi \rangle## is the same as the corresponding matrix-vector multiplication.

That makes sense, since when you find the eigen values of of the density matrix with the state vector and make it depend on the order of components, you get 1 for both options.

Thank you.
 
Well, let's do the calculation in Dirac's way, which is much simpler, because you don't need to remember so much. The statistical operator of a pure state, given by one representative state ket is
$$\hat{\rho}=|\psi \rangle \langle \psi|=(\alpha |u \rangle + \beta |d \rangle) (\alpha^* \langle u| + \beta^* \langle d|).$$
Now by definition in a basis representation, it's written as
$$\hat{\rho} = \sum_{ij} |i \rangle \langle j | \rho_{ij}.$$
Now you multiply out the ket-bra products, ans you get
$$\rho_{uu}=\alpha \alpha^*, \quad \rho_{ud}=\alpha \beta^*, \quad \rho_{du}=\beta \alpha^*, \quad \rho_{dd}=\beta \beta^*.$$
There's no need to write this in matrix form, but usually in a basis representation you write the vectors as column vectors and the co-vectors as row vectors. In this sense we map
$$|\psi \rangle \rightarrow \psi=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix}.$$
The corresponding co-vector is then
$$\psi^{\dagger}=(\alpha^* \quad \beta^*).$$
Then the corresponding projector is according to the usual rules of matrix multiplication
$$\hat{\rho}=\psi \psi^{\dagger} = \begin{pmatrix} \rho_{uu} & \rho_{ud} \\ \rho_{du} & \rho_{dd} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix} (\alpha^* \quad \beta^*) = \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \alpha^* & \alpha \beta^* \\
\beta \alpha^* & \beta \beta^* \end{pmatrix}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Terran Thrawn and odietrich
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top