I How do inflatons and gravity interact?

AI Thread Summary
Inflatons are theorized to dominate during both strong gravity conditions, such as right after the Big Bang, and weak gravity conditions, which drive the current expansion of the universe. The role of gravity during inflation is unclear since matter had not yet formed, and Guth proposes a unique repulsive gravity that facilitates inflation. Current models utilize General Relativity, where the inflaton's stress-energy tensor dominates, interacting with gravity through energy, momentum, and pressure. The energy driving the current accelerated expansion is not fully understood, and while primordial inflation produced particles, the nature of current expansion remains uncertain. The discussion highlights the complex relationship between inflatons and gravity in cosmological models.
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Is the theory that inflatons become dominate when gravity is strong (as in right after the big band) and when gravity is weak (as in driving the current expansion of the observable universe)?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The thing that drove inflation in the very early universe, and the thing that is currently driving the accelerating expansion of the universe, are not necessarily the same thing; in fact, in our best current model they aren't.

Also, you need to clarify what you mean by gravity being "strong" or "weak".
 
Matter had not yet come into existence at the time of inflation, so the role of gravity during inflation is not entirely clear. Guth suggests a special case of gravity during inflation - a repulsive form that drives inflation. In his version the energy driving inflation decays into the hot particle soup of the classical big bang.
 
  • Like
Likes Pjpic
Pjpic said:
Is the theory that inflatons become dominate when gravity is strong (as in right after the big band) and when gravity is weak (as in driving the current expansion of the observable universe)?
Current models typically make use of General Relativity, with the stress-energy tensor during inflation dominated by the inflaton. That is, inflation models have no change in gravity at all, and the inflaton interacts with gravity just like everything else: through energy, momentum, pressure, and twisting forces.
 
Chronos said:
Matter had not yet come into existence at the time of inflation, so the role of gravity during inflation is not entirely clear. Guth suggests a special case of gravity during inflation - a repulsive form that drives inflation. In his version the energy driving inflation decays into the hot particle soup of the classical big bang.

a) The density of a black hole doesn't create the same effect?

b) Does the energy driving the current expansion decay into particles?
 
Pjpic said:
a) The density of a black hole doesn't create the same effect?
Nope. The inflaton field is a bizarre creature with an unusual stress-energy content. In particular, p \propto -\rho: it is a perfect fluid with a negative pressure. In the limit that p = -\rho/3, the density \rho is constant.

b) Does the energy driving the current expansion decay into particles?
Do you mean the current accelerated expansion? Nobody knows because we lack a well-understood and well-supported model describing this accelerated expansion.

During primordial inflation, yes, that accelerated expansion did end in the production of particles.
 
  • Like
Likes Pjpic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top