How Do Insulators Handle Electron Removal and Addition?

AI Thread Summary
Removing and adding electrons to insulators is influenced by the materials involved, particularly their electronegativity; rubbing an insulator with a cloth can transfer electrons, resulting in a positive or negative charge depending on the materials used. Insulators typically do not allow free movement of charge, leading to non-uniform charge distributions on their surfaces rather than a uniform density throughout. While some methods exist for charging insulators, achieving a uniform charge distribution is nearly impossible due to inherent material properties. The concept of uniform charge density in insulators is largely theoretical, as all materials exhibit some conductivity, causing charges to eventually migrate to the surface. Overall, insulators primarily exhibit surface charge accumulation rather than uniform volume charge densities.
Mykhalo P
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just have a few conceptual questions:

Is it as difficult to remove electrons from an insulator as it is to add to it?
I understand insulators have a lower permittivity than conductors, and that they still allow charges to build upon the surface. However, I read that when you rub an insulator with a cloth, you are actually removing electrons. Can you add charges to an insulator by rubbing it with a cloth? So I'm curious which situation is more common.

How can insulators of a uniform charge density exist? Additionally, are insulators with a uniform negative charge be as likely to occur as those of a positive charge?
This one stumbles me because charges are supposed to build up on the surface. I do not understand how they can be dispersed evenly throughout a surface unless insulators in general allow electrons to move at a slower rate through its material. Can anyone please clarify?

Thank you so much for anyone who helps. I really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can add electrons to an insulator by rubbing it, it all depends on the type of material or more specifically the electronegativity of the two materials being rubbed together. If the cloth is more electronegative than the rod then it will remove electrons from it and leave the rod with a resulting positive charge. If the rod is more electronegative than the cloth then it will remove electrons from the cloth and become negatively charged. In my experience the last case is more common, that is most material charge up negatively when rubbed with a cloth. It also goes to reason that since the charging mechanism is rather random on a microscopic scale and that we are dealing with insulators, which do not allow charge to move freely about, that the resulting charge distribution on the solid material will not be uniform. Other ways of charging up solid insulators do exist, like spraying charge onto the surface, but still obtaining a uniform charge distribution is virtually impossible. The resistance of insulators do vary though and some movement do occur at higher voltages.
 
Mykhalo P said:
I understand insulators have a lower permittivity than conductors
This is incorrect. Conductors have relative permittivity of 1, typically. Insulators can have relative permittivities of several thousand.

How can insulators of a uniform charge density exist? Additionally, are insulators with a uniform negative charge be as likely to occur as those of a positive charge?
This one stumbles me because charges are supposed to build up on the surface. I do not understand how they can be dispersed evenly throughout a surface unless insulators in general allow electrons to move at a slower rate through its material. Can anyone please clarify?
Actually, having a dielectric of ANY finite volume charge density is fiction. All materials have SOME conductivity so at least eventually all charge will always be on the surface. Volume charge densities exist only in textbooks etc.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top