How Do Masses and Springs Affect Vibration Frequencies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a system of two masses connected by springs and the application of Newton's second law to derive their equations of motion. The initial equations proposed for the masses were corrected to account for the forces exerted by the springs, leading to a more accurate representation of the system. The resulting differential equations for the displacements of the masses are m1a1 + 2kx1 - kx2 = 0 and m2a2 + 2kx2 - kx1 = 3kl0. The frequencies of vibration were also derived, showing a relationship between spring constant and mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying spring forces in dynamic systems.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
Here is the situation: There is a spring connected to a wall at one end and a mass m1 at the other, which in turn is connected to another spring, which is connected to mass m2, which is connected to another spring which is connected to another wall. In other words:

Wall ----- m1 ----- m2 ----- Wall

where ----- represents a spring (all with spring constant k). Here are the questions:

(a) Apply Newton's 2. law to each mass and obtain two differential equations for the displacements x1 and x2.
(b) Determine the possible frequencies of vibration by assuming a solution of the form x1 = A1 cos ωt, x2 = A2 cos ωt.

(a) There are only two forces acting on the masses in the horizontal direction, namely the spring force, so I figured the equations are:
m1a1 = -2kx1
m2a2 = -2kx2

(b) The frequencies are:
f_1 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{2k}{m_1}}

f_2 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{2k}{m_2}}

Somehow I don't think it would be this easy. Maybe I'm missing something? What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations of motion aren't quite correct. Remember, spring forces are given by

F_{spring} = -k(l_{0} - \Delta x)

where \Delta x is the compression of the spring from its natural length l_{0}.
 
ehoon:
1.Let the positions of the masses (measured from the left-hand wall) be:
x_{1}(t), x_{2}(t) (x_{2}>x_{1})
2. Spring forces on mass 1.
a) Spring 1 attached to wall:
Clearly, a stretch of this spring will give a force in the negative direction, so:
F_{11}=-k(x_{1}-l_{0}), where l_{0} is the rest length of the spring.
b) Spring 2 attached between the masses:
Clearly a stretch of this spring will impart a force in the positive direction on mass 1, so:
F_{12}=k(x_{2}-x_{1}-l_{0})
(I've assumed that the rest lengths are equal)
3. Spring forces on mass 2:
a) Spring 2 attached between the masses:
Clearly a stretch of this spring will impart a force in the negative direction on mass 2, so:
F_{22}=-k(x_{2}-x_{1}-l_{0})
b) Spring 3 attached to the right-hand wall:
Clearly a stretch of this spring will impart a force in the positive direction on mass 2, so:
F_{23}=k(L-x_{2}-l_{0})
where L=3l_{0} is the distance between the walls.
Hence, you get the system of equations:
m_{1}\ddot{x}_{1}+2kx_{1}-kx_{2}=0
m_{2}\ddot{x}_{2}+2kx_{2}-kx_{1}=3kl_{0}

You might, of course, rewrite this system of equations in terms of displacements, rather than positions (not that I see much point in that)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top