How Do Objects Behave When Dropped from Satellites?

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
1)If an object is dropped from a satellite moving close to the Earth will it fall to the Earth or will it move along with the satellite? The answer given in my book is, it will fall to the Earth with an acceleration due to gravity. But how is it so? At the instant it is dropped, it has an orbital velocity. So it should move along with the satellite, isn’t it Sir?
2)It is said that the geostationary satellite is falling freely under gravity while orbiting the earth, then how does it have a constant orbital velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
1)If an object is dropped from a satellite moving close to the Earth will it fall to the Earth or will it move along with the satellite? The answer given in my book is, it will fall to the Earth with an acceleration due to gravity. But how is it so? At the instant it is dropped, it has an orbital velocity. So it should move along with the satellite, isn’t it Sir?
This is a guess, but perhaps the key in in the words "close to earth". A satellite in a Low Earth Orbit usually is orbiting in the Exosphere, where there is some tiny amount of air resistance. If the satellite does not use its rockets to provide periodic boosts, it will gradually lose speed and spiral earthwards.

2)It is said that the geostationary satellite is falling freely under gravity while orbiting the earth, then how does it have a constant orbital velocity?
It does not have a constant velocity - only a constant speed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top