How Do Reflections Along Different Lines Affect Point Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blafu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Reflection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the geometric transformations of point coordinates when reflected across specific lines. For reflection along the line y = x + c, a point (a, b) transforms to (b - c, a + c). Conversely, reflection along y = -x + c results in the transformation of (a, b) to (-b + c, -a + c). The validity of these transformations is confirmed by checking that points on the lines remain unchanged and that the lines connecting original and reflected points are perpendicular to the reflection lines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordinate geometry
  • Familiarity with linear equations and slopes
  • Knowledge of geometric transformations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore reflections across lines with different slopes, specifically y = mx + c where m ≠ 1 or -1
  • Investigate the properties of perpendicular lines in coordinate geometry
  • Learn about invariant points in geometric transformations
  • Study the implications of slope changes on line equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on geometry and transformations, as well as anyone interested in the applications of linear equations in coordinate systems.

blafu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We were asked to make generalisations for the following:

a.) if a point is reflected along y = x+c
b.) if a point is reflected along y = -x+c

i came up w/ the ff.:
a.) if a point is reflected along y = x+c, then the general point (a, b) will become (b-c, a+c)

b.) if a point is reflected along y = -x+c, then the general point (a, b) will become (-b+c, -a+c)

let me knw if these are correct... if not then pls guide me and tell me the correct generalisations thank u!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One easy way to check: if points are reflected around a line, then points on the line are not changed. (0, c) is on the line. If "(a, b) will become (b- c, a+ c)" then (0, c) will become (0, c). That looks good. More generally, (x, x+ c) will become ((x+c)-c, x+ c)= (x, c).

If y= -x+ c then (x, -x+ c), using (-b+c, -a+c) becomes (-(-x+c)+ c, -x+ c)= (x, -x+c) again.

To complete the check, to see if the line from (a, b) to (b-c, a+ c) is always perpendicular to y= x+ c. The slope of the line from (a, b) to (b-c, a+ c) is (a+c- b)/(b-c-a)= -1. The slope of y= x+ c is 1. Yes they are perpendicular.
 
Thank you very much...just a few followup questions (I hope it is ok to ask in this thread as well):

1) what would happen to point (a, b) if it is reflected along y = mx+c, where m is not 1 or -1 (that is, a line which slope is not -1 or 1)?
2) can "when a point A is reflected along line y = -mx+c, the line made by points A and A' have slope of 1" be made as a generalisation too?
3) can "when a point B is reflected along line y = mx+c, the line made by points B and B' have slope of -1" be made as a generalisation too?

for 2 and 3, provided that m is not 0 or undefined..., and that A and A', and B and B' are not invariant points.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K