How do scientists put satellites into space

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellites Space
AI Thread Summary
Scientists utilize specific orbital mechanics to ensure satellites pass over the same point on Earth's surface consistently. The choice of orbit depends on the satellite's purpose; geostationary satellites remain fixed above the equator, while low-earth-orbit satellites may oscillate but can still achieve repeated coverage through strategic positioning. Many satellites, such as those in GPS constellations, are designed to cover the globe despite individual variations in their positions. Surveillance satellites often employ a scanning method, adjusting their orbits to capture different areas with high resolution. The inclination of a satellite's orbit relative to the Earth's rotation is crucial for maximizing coverage over targeted regions.
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
How do scientists ensure that a satellite passes the same point on Earth's surface over and over again in each successive revolution?

Isn't there any variation in the latitude over which the satellite passes?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Depends on the purpose of the satellite and the orbit. Some satellites sit stationary above the equator. Others, in low-earth-orbit, will oscillate as you suggest, but whether that's a problem depends on the purpose of the satellite. Many types of satellites (such as GPS satellites) are launched in constellations, calculated to ensure that though individual satellites might be in different places at different times, the constellation covers the entire globe.

I'm sure enigma can provide more specifics...
 
http://orbits.eoportal.org/" site might be helpful
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of surveillance satellites (military, agricultural, geological, etc.) are deliberately set to pass over a slightly different area on each orbit in order to get more coverage at the same photographic resolution. Think of it as a scanning raster, the same as the electron gun in a CRT. The cycle keeps repeating to provide a full-scale picture.
 
If you make your satellite's equatorial inclination the same as the latitude of the area you want to photograph, you'll make several similar successive passes over that area.
Look at the ground track image below. It shows the orbits of two satellites, one with an inclination of about 55 degrees (yellow) and the other with an inclination of about 28 degrees.
The vertical lines on the map mark longitude and are 30 degrees apart. The Earth rotates at 15 degrees per hour. So after two hours, the two lines representing the orbits will be in the same places, but the image of Earth's surface below them will have drifted to the right by one 30-degree increment.
Notice where the Aleutian Islands of Alaska are. Take a look at the yellow orbit. Notice how it flattens out at the top of the orbit. There will be about 5 orbits in a row, starting between the 2nd & 3rd lines of longitude from the left, and ending between the 4th & 5th lines, where the Aleutian Islands are in excellent viewing position. Just make sure that your orbit's high point is on the day side of Earth if the Aleutians are what you want to take pictures of. A few hours later, you'll get 5 good Moscow photo opportunities in a row, and a few hours after that, 5 good Scotland opportunities in a row.
You also get the same advantage in the Southern Hemisphere, but it will be the the night side of the globe if you position yourself for Northern Hemisphere daytime viewing.
Notice the Green orbit. It's positioned nicely for 7 successive Florida flyovers. The closer to the equator you get, the more successive orbits you get. If your target is on the equator, every orbit gives you a good flyover.
 

Attachments

  • map.GIF
    map.GIF
    11.9 KB · Views: 581
sid_galt said:
How do scientists ensure that a satellite passes the same point on Earth's surface over and over again in each successive revolution?
Isn't there any variation in the latitude over which the satellite passes?
http://celestrak.com/columns/v04n07/" gives a pretty good explanation of both Geostationary and Geosynchronous orbits. The posts above already cover the polar and inclined orbits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top