How Do Sets A and B Relate Through Equivalence Properties?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pairofstrings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics Sets
pairofstrings
Messages
411
Reaction score
7
How to define relationship between two sets (mathematics)?
Please, let me make an assumption here.
Assumption : We have a set 'A' and it has a equivalent relation with another set 'B'.

Now, remember that for a set to have an equivalent relation with itself or another set it should satisfy three properties of a set i.e., 1) Reflexive property 2) Symmetric property and 3) Transitive property.
But first in order for these properties to hold true we must first validate that f c= AxB.
Now, let's keep this properties aside.

My question to you is :

1. What is it that is happening between two sets that set 'A' has to map to a particular element is set 'B'.
2. Is the set 'A' related to set 'B' by some function which has a dependent and independent variable? If 'yes' how to determine that function?
OR
3. Only properties (described above) of both the sets will determine whose elements will map to whom. If 'yes' then how can only properties decide the mapping between two sets? Explain.

Please help.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is isn't clear what you are asking. There is more than one way to define an equivalence relation on sets. You might be asking about the equivalence relation defined by "A has the same cardinality as B". It is correct that this equivalence is established by defining a 1 to 1 mapping between the elements of A and the element of B. This mapping does not have to be done in any particular way and there may be more than one way to do it. There merely has to be some way to do it.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top