How do sound waves interact when two radios are facing each other?

AI Thread Summary
When two radios face each other playing different songs, sound waves interact through a phenomenon called interference, which can create areas of louder and softer sound depending on the alignment of the waves. If both radios play the same song, the sound will generally be perceived as louder due to the combined sound power reaching the listener, although the exact volume may vary based on the listener's position. The presence of one radio does not create a significant sound shadow, meaning the sound will still be effectively heard from various angles. Diffraction occurs as sound waves encounter obstacles, but the effect from a small radio is minimal and often indistinguishable. Overall, the interaction of sound waves from two radios is complex, but typically results in a louder combined output.
doglover9754
Gold Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
35
So again, I’ve got this analytical question on my mind and it’s been bugging me for a couple weeks now. So my question is, how do sound waves work? I’m talking about if you put two radios facing each other playing different songs. What would happen? Is it if waves match then they just combine and become louder? Or is it just my hearing? How about this, if you put two radios facing each other and playing the same song. It will just become louder right? But the radio in front of the other radio is blocking the sound waves from traveling on its usual course. So wouldn’t that mean that you would hear the song at the same volume like using one radio? I’m not sure if this makes sense to you or not so I’m sorry if it doesn’t. Also, for those of you who have read my other analytical questions, I’m sorry if it seems like I’m just bugging you and I’m just overthinking it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doglover9754 said:
How about this, if you put two radios facing each other and playing the same song. It will just become louder right?
That's very oversimplified. Two loudspeakers playing exactly the same tone can produce maxima and minima (or even nulls) in various directions due to wave interference. When the sound played is a complicated, real sound like speech or music, the interference maxes and mins are in different directions for the different frequencies so you will not find a null or a maximum in any particular direction. "Twice as loud" is all you will notice because twice the sound power will reach your ears.
Any normal sized radio will not produce a noticeable 'shadow' behind it so that the sound would be pretty much twice as loud, even behind one of them.
 
sophiecentaur said:
"Twice as loud" is all you will notice because twice the sound power will reach your ears.
Any normal sized radio will not produce a noticeable 'shadow' behind it so that the sound would be pretty much twice as loud, even behind one of them.
But then won’t the sound waves bounce off the other speaker and kinda like turn to a different place (diffraction I think that’s what it’s called). So wouldn’t you hear the same volume with the 2 speakers facing each other and just one speaker? Or would it change depending on where you stand?
 
doglover9754 said:
like turn to a different place (diffraction
Yes. Diffraction will always occur at an obstacle. It's just that the obstacle, a radio, is small and its diffraction pattern would be very low level and of no identifiable form. I would actually defy you to tell any difference with second radio there or radio not there (turned off, of course). There are so many other paths for the sound to get from radio to ear.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Yes. Diffraction will always occur at an obstacle. It's just that the obstacle, a radio, is small and its diffraction pattern would be very low level and of no identifiable form. I would actually defy you to tell any difference with second radio there or radio not there (turned off, of course). There are so many other paths for the sound to get from radio to ear.
Ahhhh. That makes sense! Thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top