How Do Tractive and Braking Forces Affect Vehicle Motion on Different Gradients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul7776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the power and braking forces involved in vehicle motion on gradients. It presents a scenario with a train and a truck, detailing their masses, speeds, and resistances. Key calculations include determining the power needed for acceleration and the braking force required to stop the train on a downgrade. The truck's scenario involves calculating the braking force when stopping on a gradient and the power needed for that force. The conversation encourages participants to share their attempts and challenges to facilitate assistance.
paul7776
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
tractive motion, with gradients, Hard questions!

4.1 An engine mass of 95 tonnes is hauling a train of mass 750 tonnes along a section of level track. the tractive resistance to motion of the engine is 120 N/tonne and the rolling resistance for the train is 90 N/tonne. initially the engine is traveling at 27 km/hr and then it accelerates over a distance of 1500m.

A) Calculate the power required to achieve this increase in speed?
B)The train then meets a downgrade of 1V in 110H and is brought to a stop in a distance of 900m. calculate the braking force required to stop the train?

4.7 A large truck mass of 35 tonnes is traveling down a gradient of 1V in 60H at a speed of 90 km/hr. The rolling resitance to motion is 115 N tonne.

A) If when the brakes are applied the truck is brought to a stop in 400m what is the applied braking force?
B)How much power is required to provide this braking force?
C)If this same power were available on a uphill gradient of 1 in 60 what constant speed would the truck be capable of reaching?

If u cannot convert km/hr in2 metres per second (ms-1) its (km/hr X 1000) /3600
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi paul7776! Welcome to PF! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top