How Do Waves Propagate in an Anisotropic Dielectric Medium?

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
we have a non magnetic but anisotropic dielectric medium which has the following relationships between D and E

Dx = k1*Ex, Dy = k2*Ey, Dz = k3*Ez

we have to show that waves propogate in the z-dir'n at one speed only.

I can't get the wave eq'n to fall out. Usually you just use Maxwell's equations and the vector identity
curl(curl(E)) = grad(divE)- grad squared E
and set divE = 0. You can usually say this because in a dielectric there is no free charge therefore divD = 0 and in an LIH medium E is proportional to D therefore divE = 0 . Instead now I have to include the grad(divE) expression and the algebra doesn't even resemble the wave eq'n. I'd appreciate any hints on where I've gone wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you'll have to see what impact does

\left(\begin{array}{c} D_{x}\\D_{y}\\D_{z}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} k_{1} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & k_{2} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & k_{3} \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c} E_{x}\\E_{y}\\E_{z}\end{array}\right)

have upon the wave equations. I assume the Permittivity matrix has constant elements, if not, you'd have to be more careful with the calculus.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
If k1=k2=k, then there is a relatively simple solution.
curl(curl B)=-del^2 B=d_t curl{[k]E}. (d_t is the partial wrt t, etc.)
For the z component in Cartesian coords:
curl{[k]E}_z=d_x(k2 E_y)-d_y(k1 E_x)=k (curl E)_x, if k1=k2=k.
Then, -del^2 B_z=-k(d_t)^2 B_z, and B_z has a wave solution with
velocity=1/\sqrt{k} (All with c=1)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top