How do we find the molar mass of dry air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the molar mass of dry air, with participants exploring the implications of modeling air as an ideal gas. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the calculation of the molar mass due to air's composition of multiple gases, specifically questioning whether to use the atomic masses of oxygen or nitrogen.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between pressure, density, and the specific gas constant. There is an exploration of the internal energy of air and the appropriate use of heat capacities for diatomic molecules. Questions arise about the degrees of freedom for diatomic gases and the validity of certain formulas in the context of air's composition.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the relationships between variables and clarifying concepts related to specific heat capacities. There is an ongoing examination of the calculations and assumptions made regarding the properties of dry air, with no explicit consensus reached on all points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential typos and unit discrepancies in calculations, emphasizing the importance of clarity in definitions and the need for accurate values when discussing physical properties. The discussion also highlights the complexity of air's composition and the implications for calculations involving molar mass and internal energy.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/9484/therm.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



My main problem is with the second part of the question. Here's my attempt at the first part:

p = \rho RT \implies \rho = \frac{p}{RT} = \frac{1010 \times 10^2 \ Pa}{287 \times 300.15 K}

\therefore p = 1.1724 \ Pa

(R was the specific gas constant for dry air = 287)

And for the second part:

If air is modeled as an ideal gas the only internal energy is kinetic and we can use:

K = \frac{3}{2} n R T

(where R is the universal gas constant = 8.314)

But how do we find the number of moles for dry air? We must use the equation n=m/M. Here M is the molar mass (atomic number). But air is not a single gas, it is composed of several different gases. So how do we know its molar mass?? Do we have to use the atomic number of oxygen or nitrogen or carbon? :confused:

I appreciate any advice. If I've gone wrong anywhere else I would appreciate if somebody let's me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You wanted to determine the density, not the pressure. Do not mix them.

The specific gas constant = R(universal)/(molar mass).
ehild
 
Last edited:
roam said:
If air is modeled as an ideal gas the only internal energy is kinetic and we can use:

K = \frac{3}{2} n R T

(where R is the universal gas constant = 8.314)
As you note, air consists of mainly diatomic molecules. For temperature below 1000K, Cv = 5R/2 where R is the UNIVERSAL gas constant.

Use U = nC_vT for the internal energy.

AM
 
ehild said:
You wanted to determine the density, not the pressure. Do not mix them.

Thanks it was a typo, I meant to say \rho = 1.1725 \ Pa

The specific gas constant = R(universal)/(molar mass).

Since we are given that the specific gas constant for dry air, R*=287 J K-1 kg-1, then

M= \frac{R}{R^*} = \frac{8.314}{287} = 0.02896 \ g/mol

n = \frac{m}{M} = \frac{1000}{0.02896}= 34520.1

So, the number of moles is 34520.1?

Andrew Mason said:
As you note, air consists of mainly diatomic molecules. For temperature below 1000K, Cv = 5R/2 where R is the UNIVERSAL gas constant.

Use U = nC_vT for the internal energy.

AM

What does the symbol Cv represent?

C_v = \frac{5 \times 8.314}{2} = 20.78

And why can't we just use Kint=3/2nR*T? (in an ideal gas we only consider the kinetic since molecules interact only by collisions)
 
roam said:
What does the symbol Cv represent?

C_v = \frac{5 \times 8.314}{2} = 20.78

And why can't we just use Kint=3/2nR*T? (in an ideal gas we only consider the kinetic since molecules interact only by collisions)
Cv is heat capacity at constant volume. You cannot use Cv = 3R/2 because the diatomic molecules have rotational kinetic energy as well as translational kinetic energy resulting in 5 degrees of freedom. (It does not have vibrational kinetic energy at this temperature for reasons having to do with quantum mechanics). So U = n(5/2)RT

AM
 
roam said:
Thanks it was a typo, I meant to say \rho = 1.1725 \ Pa
?? Check this.

Since we are given that the specific gas constant for dry air, R*=287 J K-1 kg-1, then

M= \frac{R}{R^*} = \frac{8.314}{287} = 0.02896 \ g/mol
?? Better check this too - units: grams or kg?.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
?? Check this.

Oops. Thank you. I fixed the unit. :redface:

I just solved for the density ρ (rho).

ρ = p/RT => (1010 x 102)/ (287 x 300.15) = 1.1725 Kg/m3

Was that the only problem?

?? Better check this too - units: grams or kg?

Kg!

M = \frac{R^*}{R}= \frac{8.314 \ J/mol.K}{287 \ J K^{-1} Kg^{-1}} = 0.02896 \ Kg/mol

n = \frac{m}{M} = \frac{1}{0.02896} = 34.52 \ moles

K_{int} = \frac{3}{2} \times 34.52 \times 8.314 \times 300.15 = 129214.575 \ J

Is this good?

Cv is heat capacity at constant volume. You cannot use Cv = 3R/2 because the diatomic molecules have rotational kinetic energy as well as translational kinetic energy resulting in 5 degrees of freedom. (It does not have vibrational kinetic energy at this temperature for reasons having to do with quantum mechanics). So U = n(5/2)RT

I'm sure you are right but we only have the formula with 3/2 in our notes, we don't have the one with the 5/2. I think maybe for simplicity we only consider 3 degrees of freedom (x, y, z).
 
roam said:
I'm sure you are right but we only have the formula with 3/2 in our notes, we don't have the one with the 5/2. I think maybe for simplicity we only consider 3 degrees of freedom (x, y, z).


It would be wrong, as a diatomic molecule has got 5 degrees of freedom.

You can get the internal energy from Cv, the specific heat capacity at constant volume. The internal energy of an ideal gas is Cv m T.

Have you got a table for specific heat capacity of air? Like that:

http://www.ohio.edu/mechanical/thermo/property_tables/air/air_Cp_Cv.html
 
ehild said:
It would be wrong, as a diatomic molecule has got 5 degrees of freedom.

You can get the internal energy from Cv, the specific heat capacity at constant volume. The internal energy of an ideal gas is Cv m T.

Have you got a table for specific heat capacity of air? Like that:

http://www.ohio.edu/mechanical/thermo/property_tables/air/air_Cp_Cv.html

So the calculation I did in my last post would be correct for a monatomic molecule? Also what exactly are the other 2 degrees of freedom that a diatomic molecule has?

So is this calculation correct now for air:

U_{int} = \frac{5}{2} \times 34.52 \times 8.314 \times 300.15 = 215357.1 \ J

P.S. Your link says that Cv around 300 K must be 0.718. But 8.314x5/2=20.7! :confused:
 
  • #10
roam said:
So the calculation I did in my last post would be correct for a monatomic molecule? Also what exactly are the other 2 degrees of freedom that a diatomic molecule has?

Both main components of air, nitrogen and oxygen, form diatomic molecules. They are like dumbbells. Rotation about two axis, normal to the axis of symmetry of the molecule, contributes to the internal energy.
roam said:
So is this calculation correct now for air:

U_{int} = \frac{5}{2} \times 34.52 \times 8.314 \times 300.15 = 215357.1 \ J


It is correct with the approximation that the dry air is ideal gas.

roam said:
P.S. Your link says that Cv around 300 K must be 0.718. But 8.314x5/2=20.7! :confused:

The link gives measured specific heat capacity which is the heat needed to warm up 1 kg gas by 1K, not 1 mol gas, and it is given in kJ/(kgK). F/2 R is the theoretical molar heat capacity.

Multiply 718 by 1 kg and 300.15 K: It is 215507 J. Very near to your result.


ehild
 
  • #11
Thank you very much for the explanation, that makes perfect sense now.
 
  • #12
You are welcome.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
170
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K