How do we prevent the fusion reactor chamber from melting?

AI Thread Summary
In fusion reactors, high-temperature plasma is contained using strong magnetic fields to prevent contact with the chamber walls, which would otherwise melt. The most advanced project utilizing this method is ITER, a tokamak reactor. While there are alternative approaches to magnetic confinement, such as stellarators like Wendelstein 7-X, these still rely entirely on magnetic fields. Tokamaks generate magnetic fields from plasma currents in addition to external coils, whereas stellarators use coils exclusively. Understanding these methods is crucial for advancing fusion technology.
woonjy2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
this question might be a bit stupid, but if the plasma in the fusion reactor has very high temperature, then how do we make the chamber not melt? i mean, not to join? contact? each other(chamber wall and plasma).
do we use magnetic field to make the distance? then how do we do that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Last edited:
rootone said:
There is at least one other approach which is not entirely reliant on magnetic confinement, although that is still a part of the story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X

This statement is very misleading. It is true that there are alternatives to magnetic confinement.
However, stellarators like Wendelstein rely entirely of magnetic confinement.
 
thanks!
 
OK thanks for that correction, I had thought that the stellarator project used a combination of containment methods, with magnetism being one, but didn't have time to recheck on that.
 
Both tokamak and stellarator use magnetic fields only. Just the origin of the field is different: Tokamaks need a magnetic field component that has to come from a plasma current (together with the stronger fields from coils), stellarators work with magnetic fields from coils only.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top