How Do Wind and Plane Speeds Combine to Affect Ground Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving the velocities of a plane and wind to determine ground velocity without using the cosine law. A plane is traveling at 285 km/h at an angle of E45ºS, while the wind blows at 75 km/h at N22ºE. The teacher emphasizes using vector resolution by breaking down the velocities into x and y components and applying the Pythagorean theorem. The original poster's calculations led to confusion regarding the addition of the components, resulting in an incorrect total. Participants suggest redrawing the diagram to correctly represent vector addition and clarify the directions.
rossel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having troubles with a question concerning relative motion. The problem goes:

A plane is traveling at an air speed of 285 km/h [E45ºS]. A wind is blowing to the northeast at 75 km/h [N22ºE] relative to the ground. Determine the velocity relative to the ground.

My teach prefers that we do not use the cosine law to determine the unknown vector, and instead requests that when we draw our diagram, we do something called the resolution of vectors. Which is separating the two vectors into x and y components, add the x's and y's together and use Pythagorean theorum to solve.

The cosine law provided me with the correct answer for this question, which was 265 km/h.

However, in using his method, my diagram (which was correct, and I have attached, to anyone who is confused), resembled a rectangle, and I came up with these calculations:

285/sin90 = x1/sin45
x1 = 202 km/h

x2/sin22 = 75/sin90
x2 = 28 km/h

Therefore, shouldn't x1 + x2 = 265 km/h ?
Please help me!
 

Attachments

  • physicshelp.gif
    physicshelp.gif
    5.7 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, I'm confused by your diagram. Your directions don't look right (which way on the diagram is north?). Plus you haven't drawn the vectors as being added.

To add vectors... suppose your adding a vector B to vector A... The tail (part without the arrow) of B has to be placed at the head (part with the arrow) of A.

Draw the diagram again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top