How Do You Analyze a Charged Shape Described by a Mathematical Function?

acedeno
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part b) if p(x,y,z) were the material density in grams / cc and the surface of the object made out of this material had the equation x^2+y^z = a*z, how would you calculate the total mass of the object? For part b), instead of density, assume p(x,y,z) is the amount of charge over a unit portion of the volume of the object.
 
SteamKing said:
For part b) if p(x,y,z) were the material density in grams / cc and the surface of the object made out of this material had the equation x^2+y^z = a*z, how would you calculate the total mass of the object? For part b), instead of density, assume p(x,y,z) is the amount of charge over a unit portion of the volume of the object.

I'm sorry but I'm really not following. I guess I could find mass by using m=(density)(volume) but I'm still uncertain on how to express the volume of this object.
 
Do you recognize:

Q = \int_{\mathcal{V}} \rho d\tau^{'}

This is the general equation for total charge over a volume with a given charge density
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top