How Do You Calculate Angular Acceleration from Car Deceleration?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate angular acceleration from car deceleration, the relationship between linear and angular motion must be applied. The car's tires make 85 revolutions while decelerating from 90 km/h to 30 km/h, and the diameter of the tires is 0.80 m. Angular acceleration can be derived using the formula α = (ω_final - ω_initial) / Δt, but Δt is not provided, necessitating the use of angular kinematics equations. The discussion emphasizes that 30 km/h and 90 km/h must be converted to angular speeds for accurate calculations. Sufficient information is available to determine angular acceleration using the appropriate kinematic equations without needing to know Δt directly.
chazgurl4life
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
The tires of a car make 85 revolutions as the car reduces its speed uniformly from 90 km/h to 30 km/h. The tires have a diameter of 0.80 m.
(a) What was the angular acceleration of the tires?
rad/s2
angular acceleration = Omega final- Omega intial / Delta Time


does that mean that in this case angular acceleration= 30 km/hr-90km/hr /Delta T ...but we don't have Delta T so is there another equation i could use?

(b) If the car continues to decelerate at this rate, how much more time is required for it to stop?
s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\alpha = a_T /r [/ tex] you can find the linear acceleration (you know the initial and final velocities and you can find the distance travelled) and you have the radius. 30hm/hr and 90km/hr are NOT angular speeds. <br /> <br /> just use angular kinetmatics for the second part.
 
Last edited:
for further help:

there are three essential kinematics equations. for angular kinematics:

1) theta = theta_initial + omega_initial*t + 1/2 alpha*t
2) omega = omega_initial + alpha*t
3) omega^2 = omega_initial^2 + 2*alpha*theta.

notice that 1 and 2 involve time, will 3 does not. (i have used the typical greek symbols for angle, angular velocity, and angular accelaration.)

you are given enough information to find alpha using just one of these three equations...

(remember to convert linear quantities to angular quantities!)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top