How Do You Calculate Angular Momentum for Different Pivot Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AriAstronomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
AI Thread Summary
To calculate angular momentum for a system with a particle and a meter stick, the correct approach depends on the pivot point. For a pivot at the 50.0-cm mark, using L = Iω yields the correct result, while using L = r x p can lead to errors if not applied correctly. The L = r x p method is suitable for point masses, but for extended objects, it requires integrating over mass elements. It's important to note that L = Iω is valid only for axes through the center of rotation or center of mass. For other pivot points, the formula must account for both the moment of inertia and the position of the center of mass.
AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle with a mass of 0.400 kg is attached to the
100-cm mark of a meter stick with a mass of 0.100 kg. The
meter stick rotates on a horizontal, frictionless table
with an angular speed of 4.00 rad/s. Calculate the angu-
lar momentum of the system when the stick is pivoted
about an axis (a) perpendicular to the table through
the 50.0-cm mark and (b) perpendicular to the table
through the 0-cm mark.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I only need help with part a): Basically, I know I can get the right answer using L = Iw:
L = (I_rod + I_mass)w = (1/12ML^2 + MR^2)w = .433 = correct.
If however, I use the other definition L = rxp:
L = rxp_rod + rxp_mass = rMwr_rod + mwr^2 = 0.5 = incorrect. What am I missing? Seems like it's in the rod term. I guess r implies radius, and would work if it was a disk perhaps? Should I always go with the L = Iw definition if working with non radial objects?

Thanks,
Ari
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L = rxp is easy to use when the object associated with the momentum p is a point mass. When it's some extended shape then you have to break it down into mass elements (dm) each with its own bit of momentum (dp) over all of the object, and apply L = r x dp to all of them, summing as you go. Yes, it's an integral :wink:
 
Hi Ari! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
AriAstronomer said:
If however, I use the other definition L = rxp:
L = rxp_rod + rxp_mass = rMwr_rod + mwr2 = 0.5 = incorrect. What am I missing? Seems like it's in the rod term. I guess r implies radius, and would work if it was a disk perhaps? Should I always go with the L = Iw definition if working with non radial objects?

Yes, you're right, it is the rod term. :smile:

L = r x p will always work for a point mass, but you need to use https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=31" for anything else.

So you can use r x p for the mass in either case, and add it to the Iω for the rod, or you can use Iω for the rod-plus-mass.

btw, L = Iω only works for an axis through the centre of rotation (as in boht these cases) or the centre of mass …

for any other point, you need L = Ic.o.m.ω + r x mvc.o.m. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top