How Do You Calculate Angular Momentum for Different Pivot Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AriAstronomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating angular momentum for a system consisting of a particle and a meter stick, specifically when pivoted at different points. The correct approach involves using the formula L = Iω, where I represents the moment of inertia and ω is the angular speed. For the meter stick and attached mass, the moment of inertia is calculated using I_rod = (1/12)ML² for the rod and I_mass = MR² for the mass. The user, Ari, initially misapplied the L = r x p formula, which is suitable for point masses but requires integration for extended objects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics
  • Basic calculus for integration of mass elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the application of L = r x p for extended bodies
  • Explore the concept of center of mass in rotational systems
  • Investigate the effects of pivot points on angular momentum calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators looking for clear examples of angular momentum calculations.

AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle with a mass of 0.400 kg is attached to the
100-cm mark of a meter stick with a mass of 0.100 kg. The
meter stick rotates on a horizontal, frictionless table
with an angular speed of 4.00 rad/s. Calculate the angu-
lar momentum of the system when the stick is pivoted
about an axis (a) perpendicular to the table through
the 50.0-cm mark and (b) perpendicular to the table
through the 0-cm mark.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I only need help with part a): Basically, I know I can get the right answer using L = Iw:
L = (I_rod + I_mass)w = (1/12ML^2 + MR^2)w = .433 = correct.
If however, I use the other definition L = rxp:
L = rxp_rod + rxp_mass = rMwr_rod + mwr^2 = 0.5 = incorrect. What am I missing? Seems like it's in the rod term. I guess r implies radius, and would work if it was a disk perhaps? Should I always go with the L = Iw definition if working with non radial objects?

Thanks,
Ari
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L = rxp is easy to use when the object associated with the momentum p is a point mass. When it's some extended shape then you have to break it down into mass elements (dm) each with its own bit of momentum (dp) over all of the object, and apply L = r x dp to all of them, summing as you go. Yes, it's an integral :wink:
 
Hi Ari! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
AriAstronomer said:
If however, I use the other definition L = rxp:
L = rxp_rod + rxp_mass = rMwr_rod + mwr2 = 0.5 = incorrect. What am I missing? Seems like it's in the rod term. I guess r implies radius, and would work if it was a disk perhaps? Should I always go with the L = Iw definition if working with non radial objects?

Yes, you're right, it is the rod term. :smile:

L = r x p will always work for a point mass, but you need to use https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=31" for anything else.

So you can use r x p for the mass in either case, and add it to the Iω for the rod, or you can use Iω for the rod-plus-mass.

btw, L = Iω only works for an axis through the centre of rotation (as in boht these cases) or the centre of mass …

for any other point, you need L = Ic.o.m.ω + r x mvc.o.m. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K