How Do You Calculate Average Angular Acceleration from Revolutions?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate average angular acceleration from revolutions, the turntable's final speed of 45 revolutions per minute (rev/min) must first be converted to radians per second (rad/s). The correct conversion involves recognizing that 1 revolution equals 2π radians, leading to a conversion of 45 rev/min to 4.71 rad/s. Using the equation ω = ωo + αt, where the initial angular speed (ωo) is 0, the average angular acceleration (α) can be calculated as α = (4.71 rad/s) / (1.5 s), resulting in approximately 3.14 rad/s². The initial attempt at conversion was incorrect as it mistakenly treated revolutions as degrees. Accurate unit conversion is essential for solving angular acceleration problems correctly.
BrainMan
Messages
279
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A turntable moves from rest to an angular speed of 45 rev/min in 1.5 s. What is its average angular acceleration?


Homework Equations


ω = ωo + \alphat


The Attempt at a Solution


I first converted 45 to radians by multiplying it by pi
45(3.14152654)/180 = .79 rad
then I plugged it into the above equation
.79 = α(1.5)
α = .53 r/s2
The actual answer is pi r/s2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your conversion is where the problem is. You want to convert from rev/min to rad/sec

First let's convert from rev/min to rad/min:

How many radians are in 1 revolution?
 
Nathanael said:
Your conversion is where the problem is. You want to convert from rev/min to rad/sec

First let's convert from rev/min to rad/min:

How many radians are in 1 revolution?
2 pi
 
BrainMan said:
2 pi

So if I have 45\frac{rev}{min} how many \frac{radians}{min} will it be?
 
BrainMan said:
I first converted 45 to radians by multiplying it by pi
45(3.14152654)/180 = .79 rad

That is how you convert 45 DEGREES into radians. But the number 45 has units of REVOLUTIONS, not degrees.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top