How Do You Calculate Capacitance for Different Types of Capacitors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmattson07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of a spherical capacitor with given radii and converting the result to picofarads. The initial calculation yields a capacitance of approximately 3.984e-11 F, which is incorrectly converted to 0.3984 pF. Clarification is provided that the correct conversion should yield 39.84 pF instead. Additionally, the participant seeks to determine the plate area for a parallel-plate capacitor with the same capacitance and plate separation. Accurate unit conversion and understanding of capacitance formulas are emphasized throughout the discussion.
mmattson07
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The plates of a spherical capacitor have radii 30.3 mm and 33.1 mm. (a) Calculate the capacitance in picofarads. (b) What must be the plate area in square centimeters of a parallel-plate capacitor with the same plate separation and capacitance?

Homework Equations


C= 4\Pi\epsilon(ab/b-a) (Spherical Capacitor)
C=\epsilonA/d (Parallel Plate)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
I am having trouble with the conversion to pF. I know it's 10^-12.
=>C= 4\Pi\epsilon((.0303*.0331)/(.0331-.0303))=3.984e-11 F = .3984 pF ??

b) =>A=Cd/\epsilon = 3.984e-11 F(.0331-.0303)/8.85e-12

Thanks!

 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmattson07 said:
3.984e-11 F = .3984 pF ??

You made a mistake in conversion:

<br /> 10^{-11} \, \mathrm{F} = 10^{1 - 12} \, \mathrm{F} = 10^{1} \, 10^{-12} \, \mathrm{F} = 10 \, \mathrm{pF}<br />
 
Still confused...how do I convert then? Is it 3.984e-12 pF??
 
Or 39.84 pF?
 
Last edited:
mmattson07 said:
Or 39.84 pF?

yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top