How Do You Calculate Electric Field and Potential in a Parallel Plate Capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field and potential in a parallel plate capacitor, the charge density is determined using the formula charge density = q / a. The electric field (E) is calculated as E = charge density / permittivity, leading to an initial value of 2*10^-3. The potential difference (PD) is found by multiplying the electric field by the distance between the plates, resulting in PD = 1*10^-5. The energy stored in the capacitor is calculated using the formula u = 0.5 * V * q, yielding an energy of 2.5*10^-13 J. Corrections were suggested regarding the orders of magnitude and the use of permittivity, emphasizing the need for accurate calculations.
ledwardz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plate capacitor has a charge of 50pC
area = 10mm^2
dielectric material permittivity = 2.5
distance between plates = 0.5 mm

find the electric field
the potential difference between the 2 plates
the energy stored in the capacitor


Homework Equations



electric field = Charge density / permittivity
charge density = q / a

therefore E = 5*10^-3 / 2.5 = 2* 10 ^-3

PD= Ed = 2*10^-3 * 0.005 = 1*10^-5

energy u = 0.5V*q = 0.5 * 1*10^-5* 50*10^-9 = 2.5*10^-13 J

can anyone tell me if this is correct? thanks again for any help. Cheers, Lee:shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have lost track of the orders of magnitude in the charge density. Check the calculation.

The permittivity κ is a multiplier for the vacuum permittivity, εo.
 
gneill said:
You seem to have lost track of the orders of magnitude in the charge density. Check the calculation.

The permittivity κ is a multiplier for the vacuum permittivity, εo.

ahh pooo. so ε = εor but i have the right idea for the rest of the equation?

thanks for reply also.
 
ledwardz said:
ahh pooo. so ε = εor but i have the right idea for the rest of the equation?

thanks for reply also.

Sure. Straighten out the powers of ten and the permittivity and you're golden.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top