How Do You Calculate Electric Fields and Forces Between Charged Rods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acedeno
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and force between two charged rods positioned along the x-axis. The user attempts to derive the electric field produced by the left rod at points along the positive x-axis using the integral E=∫[dq/4πε_naught*r^2]. Clarifications arise regarding the use of variables, particularly the distinction between the integration variable and the point of interest on the x-axis. The user refines their approach by expressing the distance correctly and adjusting the integral accordingly. Overall, the conversation emphasizes proper variable usage and integration techniques in electrostatics.
acedeno
Messages
34
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Two thin rods of length L lie along the x-axis, one between x = a and x = a + L, and the other between
x = –a and x = –a – L. Each rod has positive charge Q distributed uniformly along its length.
a. Calculate the electric field as a function of x produced by the rod on the left hand side
(from –a – L to –a) at points along the positive x-axis.
b. Determine the magnitude of the force that one rod exerts on the other.

Homework Equations


E=∫[dq/4πε_naught*r^2] where dq=λdx for a line of charge

The Attempt at a Solution


Well since for part a, they only want the electric field in the positive x-axis I came up with:

E=∫from -a to -a-L of [λdx/4πε_naught*(-a-L+x)^2

giving me:

E=L/2a+L(2a+2L) when the integral is evaluated from -a to -a-L. - I'm aware I need to multiply my constants back in but for right now, I'm just worried about the integral.

Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
acedeno said:
bump
Please read and follow the rules of these Forums. Wait 24 hours before bumping.

Regarding your integral: E=∫from -a to -a-L of [λdx/4πε_naught*(-a-L+x)^2 ,

What does x represent?

You seem to have used x for two different things in the same expression.
 
x is suppose to represent where you are on the x axis.

-regarding the bump, sorry it won't happen again.
 
acedeno said:
x is suppose to represent where you are on the x axis.

-regarding the bump, sorry it won't happen again.

But you have (λ dx) in the integral, so in that sense, you're using x as the integration variable.

Use something like x0 (or some variable like u or s), for the place at which you are finding E. You then need to express the distance from x0 to the point x on the rod, over which you are integrating. --- r = x0 - x .
 
Sorry, I'm not following. The way I see it, when you take all the constants out you are just integrating dx/(-a-L+x)^2
 
Yes, but that's not what you should be integrating.

(-a-L+x) is the distance between point x, and point (a + L) on the x axis.

What would the integral be if you were finding E at a fixed location, such as at x = 1.357 meter, on the x-axis ?
 
Okay, I think I know what you mean.

E=∫kdq/r^2 let dq=λdl and r =(a+x), the distance from the end of the rod to a +x value
E=λk/(a+x)^2∫dl -integrating from -a-L to -aE=λk/(a+x)^2[(-a)-(-a-L)]

E=λkL/(a+x)^2

How's that look?

edit: I decided to use k rather than 1 over 4pi epsilon naught
 
No. r should be the distance between the element of charge, dq, and x. So, r = x - l.
 
Back
Top