How Do You Calculate Electric Potential Energy in a Multi-Charge System?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate electric potential energy in a multi-charge system, the total potential energy (TPE) is derived from the contributions of each pair of charges. The formula used is TPE = PE11 + PE12 + (PE13 + PE23), where each PE term represents the potential energy between specific charge pairs. The charges are assumed to be brought in from infinity, with specific values assigned to each charge. The user seeks confirmation on whether their approach and calculations are correct. Clarification on the visibility of the referenced image is also requested.
synergix
Messages
177
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the electric potential energy for the charge configuration shown below.
http://webct6.nic.bc.ca/webct/RelativeResourceManager/Template/CourseMaterials/CourseContent_2007FA/Assignments/PHY060W_Assignment_07_files/image025.jpg"

Homework Equations


PE=-W=qV=q(vb-va)

The Attempt at a Solution



It is assumed that the charges are being brought in from infinity the -3.0 micro coulomb charge is charge one, 5.0 micro coulomb charge is number 3

TPE=PE11+PE12+(PE13+PE23)
TPE= 0J+[(q1KQ2)/r2] + [(q1KQ3)/r1 + (q2KQ3)/r3]

where q1 is charge 1, q2 and Q2 are charge 2, Q3 is charge 3, r1 is the distance between q1 and Q3, r2 is the distance between charge 1 and 2, r3 is the distance between q2 and Q3.

am I on the right track can I simply solve this equation to get the right answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry your image isn't viewable.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electromagnetism problem: Merging of 2 charged drops of mercury
Replies
2
Views
1K
Calculating Electric Potential Energy for a Charge Configuration
Replies
4
Views
1K
Electric potential due to collection of charged particles
Replies
3
Views
2K
Help with determining distance where electric potential is 0
Replies
3
Views
2K
Electric Potential and Second Charge
Replies
2
Views
5K
Electric Potential due to two charges
Replies
7
Views
5K
How do you calculate Electric Potential Energy in a Square?
Replies
2
Views
4K
How Do You Calculate Electric Potential for a Given Charge Distribution?
Replies
20
Views
2K
Understanding Electrical Potential Energy of a charge distribution
Replies
5
Views
2K
Zero Potential and Electric Intensity in a 2D Plane with 3 Point Charges
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top